Comparative effectiveness of switching to alternative tumour necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists versus switching to rituximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who failed previous TNF antagonists: the MIRAR Study
- PMID: 22736086
- DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201324
Comparative effectiveness of switching to alternative tumour necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists versus switching to rituximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who failed previous TNF antagonists: the MIRAR Study
Abstract
Objective: To compare the effectiveness of switching to rituximab (RTX) with switching to alternative tumour necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) failing on TNF antagonists.
Methods: A multicentre prospective 3-year observational study was performed in patients with RA treated with RTX or an alternative TNF antagonist. The baseline 28-joint disease activity score (DAS28) and Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score were compared with 6, 9 and 12 month values, adjusting for propensity score quintiles. Propensity scores were estimated for each patient using logistic regression with treatment as the dependent variable and baseline prior number of TNFs >1, years from diagnosis >5, extra-articular manifestations, previous toxicity, use of ≥2 disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, age and sex as independent variables.
Results: 1124 patients were treated with either RTX (n=591, 52.6%) or alternative TNF antagonists (n=533, 47.4%). RTX-treated patients had longer disease duration (p=0.0001), larger numbers of previous TNF antagonists (p<0.0001) and tender and swollen joints (p<0.0001). There was no significant difference in the reduction in DAS28 at 6, 9 and 12 months between RTX-treated patients and those treated with TNF antagonists. However, the reduction in DAS28 was significantly different between RTX-treated patients and adalimumab/infliximab-treated patients (p=0.001 and p=0.05, respectively). There was a marginally significant difference at any time period in the proportion of patients achieving an improvement in the HAQ score of >0.22 (p=0.06).
Conclusions: Optimal treatment for patients with RA failing on treatment with TNF antagonists may include RTX. This study suggests that the improvement in DAS28 is larger in patients treated with RTX than in those treated with monoclonal anti-TNF agents.
Comment in
-
Comparative effectiveness of biologic antirheumatic therapies in rheumatoid arthritis after failure to respond to a first TNF inhibitor.J Comp Eff Res. 2012 Nov;1(6):481-4. doi: 10.2217/cer.12.50. J Comp Eff Res. 2012. PMID: 24236466
Similar articles
-
Which subgroup of patients with rheumatoid arthritis benefits from switching to rituximab versus alternative anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) agents after previous failure of an anti-TNF agent?Ann Rheum Dis. 2010 Feb;69(2):387-93. doi: 10.1136/ard.2008.105064. Epub 2009 May 4. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010. PMID: 19416802 Free PMC article.
-
Rituximab or a second anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy for rheumatoid arthritis patients who have failed their first anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy? Comparative analysis from the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register.Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012 Aug;64(8):1108-15. doi: 10.1002/acr.21663. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012. PMID: 22422731 Free PMC article.
-
B cell depletion may be more effective than switching to an alternative anti-tumor necrosis factor agent in rheumatoid arthritis patients with inadequate response to anti-tumor necrosis factor agents.Arthritis Rheum. 2007 May;56(5):1417-23. doi: 10.1002/art.22520. Arthritis Rheum. 2007. PMID: 17469098
-
Sarilumab for Previously-Treated Moderate or Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis: An Evidence Review Group Perspective of a NICE Single Technology Appraisal.Pharmacoeconomics. 2018 Dec;36(12):1427-1437. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0677-7. Pharmacoeconomics. 2018. PMID: 29882210 Review.
-
Down-titration and discontinuation strategies of tumour necrosis factor-blocking agents for rheumatoid arthritis in patients with low disease activity.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 May 24;5(5):CD010455. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010455.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019. PMID: 31125448 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Rituximab for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: an update.Drug Des Devel Ther. 2013 Dec 27;8:87-100. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S41645. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2013. PMID: 24403823 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Defining response to TNF-inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis: the negative impact of anti-TNF cycling and the need for a personalized medicine approach to identify primary non-responders.Clin Rheumatol. 2019 Nov;38(11):2967-2976. doi: 10.1007/s10067-019-04684-1. Epub 2019 Sep 13. Clin Rheumatol. 2019. PMID: 31520227 Review.
-
Rituximab for Rheumatoid Arthritis.Rheumatol Ther. 2015 Dec;2(2):99-111. doi: 10.1007/s40744-015-0016-9. Epub 2015 Aug 19. Rheumatol Ther. 2015. PMID: 27747531 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Improving rheumatoid arthritis comparative effectiveness research through causal inference principles: systematic review using a target trial emulation framework.Ann Rheum Dis. 2020 Jul;79(7):883-890. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217200. Epub 2020 May 7. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020. PMID: 32381560 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of the clinical effectiveness of tumour necrosis factor inhibitors and abatacept after insufficient response to tocilizumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.Clin Rheumatol. 2016 Nov;35(11):2829-2834. doi: 10.1007/s10067-016-3227-8. Epub 2016 Mar 12. Clin Rheumatol. 2016. PMID: 26971256
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical