Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jun 22:3:114.
doi: 10.3389/fgene.2012.00114. eCollection 2012.

Uses and implications of field disease data for livestock genomic and genetics studies

Affiliations

Uses and implications of field disease data for livestock genomic and genetics studies

Stephen C Bishop et al. Front Genet. .

Abstract

This paper identifies issues associated with field disease data and their implications on the interpretation of estimated genetic parameters and experimental designs. The main focus is on concepts relating to the impacts of diagnostic test properties and exposure to infection, and how exposure to infection is intricately related to within-herd epidemic dynamics. The following are raised challenges: (i) to more fully understand and describe the dynamic impacts of disease epidemics on genetic interpretations; (ii) to develop statistical methods to jointly estimate epidemiological and genetic parameters from complex epidemiological data; (iii) to develop and explore optimal experimental designs for case-control studies, exploiting field disease data. Solving these problems would add insight to both disease genetic and epidemiological studies, as well as enabling us to better select animals for increased disease resistance.

Keywords: animal; epidemiology; field data; genome wide association analysis; heritability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Infection probability as a function of dosage level for three hypothetical major-gene genotypes, illustrating how the inferred mode of resistance will change as dosage level changes.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Numbers of infectious animals during the course of an hypothetical epidemic, for three modes of transmission of infection, (i) SI model in which infected animals remain infectious, (ii) SIR model in which infected animals recover so that they are no longer infectious and remain immune to the infection, (iii) SIRS model in which recovered animals lose their immunity and become immunologically susceptible again. Non-zero parameter values are identical for each model. Population size is 1000 animals.

References

    1. Anderson R. M., May R. M. (1991). Infectious Diseases of Humans. Dynamics and Control. Oxford: Oxford University Press
    1. Bijma P., Muir W. M., Van Arendonk J. A. M. (2007). Multilevel selection 1: quantitative genetics of inheritance and response to selection. Genetics 175, 277–28810.1534/genetics.106.062711 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bishop S. C., Woolliams J. A. (2010). On the genetic interpretation of disease data. PLoS ONE 5, e8940.10.1371/journal.pone.0008940 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brotherstone S., White I. M. S., Coffey M., Downs S. H., Mitchell A. P., Clifton-Hadley R. S., More S. J., Good M., Woolliams J. A. (2010). Evidence of genetic resistance of cattle to infection with Mycobacterium bovis. J. Dairy Sci. 93, 1234–124210.3168/jds.2009-2609 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Davies G., Genini S., Bishop S. C., Giuffra E. (2009). An assessment of the opportunities to dissect host genetic variation in resistance to infectious diseases in livestock. Animal 3, 415–43610.1017/S1751731108003522 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources