Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jul;18(7):MT60-5.
doi: 10.12659/msm.883199.

Time-resolved imaging of contrast kinetics does not improve performance of follow-up MRA of embolized intracranial aneurysms

Affiliations

Time-resolved imaging of contrast kinetics does not improve performance of follow-up MRA of embolized intracranial aneurysms

Zbigniew Serafin et al. Med Sci Monit. 2012 Jul.

Abstract

Background: The use of contrast media and the time-resolved imaging of contrast kinetics (TRICKS) technique have some theoretical advantages over time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography (TOF-MRA) in the follow-up of intracranial aneurysms after endovascular treatment. We prospectively compared the diagnostic performance of TRICKS and TOF-MRA with digital subtracted angiography (DSA) in the assessment of occlusion of embolized aneurysms.

Material/methods: Seventy-two consecutive patients with 72 aneurysms were examined 3 months after embolization. Test characteristics of TOF-MRA and TRICKS were calculated for the detection of residual flow. The results of quantification of flow were compared with weighted kappa. Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility was determined.

Results: The sensitivity of TOF-MRA was 85% (95% CI, 65-96%) and of TRICKS, 89% (95% CI, 70-97%). The specificity of both methods was 91% (95% CI, 79-98%). The accuracy of the flow quantification ranged from 0.76 (TOF-MRA) to 0.83 (TRICKS). There was no significant difference between the methods in the area under the ROC curve regarding both the detection and the quantification of flow. Intraobserver reproducibility was very good with both techniques (kappa, 0.86-0.89). The interobserver reproducibility was moderate for TOF-MRA and very good for TRICKS (kappa, 0.74-0.80).

Conclusions: In this study, TOF-MRA and TRICKS presented similar diagnostic performance; therefore, the use of time-resolved contrast-enhanced MRA is not justified in the follow-up of embolized aneurysms.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Consecutive phases of cerebral TRICKS angiography.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Follow-up MRA after embolization of the left internal carotid artery aneurysm. The residual aneurysm neck (arrows) has similar morphology in TOF-MRA (A) and TRICKS (B).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Follow-up angiography with 3D-DSA (A), TOF-MRA (B), and TRICKS (C). The residual flow area (arrows) in the anterior communicating artery aneurysm was not detected by TOF-MRA.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Qureshi AI, Vazquez G, Tariq N, et al. Impact of International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial results on treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms in the United States. J Neurosurg. 2010;114:834–41. - PubMed
    1. Gnanalingham KK, Apostolopoulos V, Barazi S, O’Neill K. The impact of the international subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) on the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage in a neurosurgical unit in the UK. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2006;108:117–23. - PubMed
    1. Ferns SP, Sprengers ME, van Rooij WJ, et al. Coiling of intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review on initial occlusion and reopening and retreatment rates. Stroke. 2009;40:e523–29. - PubMed
    1. Ries T, Siemonsen S, Thomalla G, et al. Long-term follow-up of cerebral aneurysms after endovascular therapy prediction and outcome of retreatment. Am J Neuroradiol. 2007;28:1755–61. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ringer AJ, Rodriguez-Mercado R, Veznedaroglu E, et al. Defining the risk of retreatment for aneurysm recurrence or residual after initial treatment by endovascular coiling: a multicenter study. Neurosurgery. 2009;65:311–15. - PubMed

Publication types