The influence of sex, gestational age, birth weight, blood transfusion, and timing of the heel prick on the pancreatitis-associated protein concentration in newborn screening for cystic fibrosis
- PMID: 22739940
- DOI: 10.1007/s10545-012-9498-6
The influence of sex, gestational age, birth weight, blood transfusion, and timing of the heel prick on the pancreatitis-associated protein concentration in newborn screening for cystic fibrosis
Abstract
Background: Pancreatitis-associated protein (PAP) is currently discussed as a marker in newborn screening (NBS) for cystic fibrosis (CF). However, it is not known if PAP concentrations are influenced by sex, gestational age, birth weight, blood transfusion or time of collection and what this would mean for NBS for CF.
Methods: In 2008 all newborns in part of the Netherlands were screened for CF by an IRT/PAP protocol. PAP concentration was determined by the MucoPAP ELISA (DynaBio), which was modified to a Dissociation Enhanced Lanthanide Fluoroimmunoassay (DELFIA) method following a protocol of PerkinElmer.
Results: In healthy newborns, the median PAP concentration was 0.5 μg/l (Interquartile range (IQR 0.3-0.8) whereas this was 3.2 μg/l (IQR 2.0-12.5) in CF infants. PAP concentrations were lower in premature infants 0.94 and 0.91 times for 25 to 31 + 6 weeks GA and 32 to 36 + 6 weeks respectively. A higher PAP concentration was observed in low-birth-weight infants (<2500 gram)(p = 0.001), per 100 gram birth weight gained the PAP concentration decreased with 0.1 %. PAP levels were higher after a blood transfusion, the 95th percentile increased from 1.3 to 3.6 μg/l leading to a higher false-positive rate. The PAP concentration increased when newborn screening was performed more than 168 hours (day 7) after birth (β = 1.63), the 95th percentile increased from 1.3-1.6 μg/l to 4.0 μg/l after 168 hours (72,874 newborns were screened).
Conclusion: Sex, birth weight, and gestational age lead to small differences in PAP concentrations without consequences for the screening algorithm. However, blood transfusion as well as performance of the heel prick after 168 hours (7 days) lead to clinically significant higher PAP levels and to a higher risk on a false-positive screening test result.
Similar articles
-
Five years of experience with biochemical cystic fibrosis newborn screening based on IRT/PAP in Germany.Pediatr Pulmonol. 2015 Jul;50(7):655-64. doi: 10.1002/ppul.23190. Epub 2015 Apr 23. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2015. PMID: 25914230
-
Initial evaluation of a biochemical cystic fibrosis newborn screening by sequential analysis of immunoreactive trypsinogen and pancreatitis-associated protein (IRT/PAP) as a strategy that does not involve DNA testing in a Northern European population.J Inherit Metab Dis. 2010 Oct;33(Suppl 2):S263-71. doi: 10.1007/s10545-010-9174-7. Epub 2010 Aug 17. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2010. PMID: 20714932
-
Prospective and parallel assessments of cystic fibrosis newborn screening protocols in the Czech Republic: IRT/DNA/IRT versus IRT/PAP and IRT/PAP/DNA.Eur J Pediatr. 2012 Aug;171(8):1223-9. doi: 10.1007/s00431-012-1747-z. Epub 2012 May 12. Eur J Pediatr. 2012. PMID: 22581207 Clinical Trial.
-
Pancreatitis-Associated Protein in Neonatal Screening for Cystic Fibrosis: Strengths and Weaknesses.Int J Neonatal Screen. 2020 Mar 30;6(2):28. doi: 10.3390/ijns6020028. eCollection 2020 Jun. Int J Neonatal Screen. 2020. PMID: 33073025 Free PMC article. Review.
-
False negative newborn screen and neonatal cholestasis in a premature child with cystic fibrosis.Eur J Pediatr. 2014 Dec;173(12):1581-3. doi: 10.1007/s00431-013-2135-z. Epub 2013 Aug 15. Eur J Pediatr. 2014. PMID: 23949094 Review.
Cited by
-
Influence of Season, Storage Temperature and Time of Sample Collection in Pancreatitis-Associated Protein-Based Algorithms for Newborn Screening for Cystic Fibrosis.Int J Neonatal Screen. 2024 Jan 12;10(1):5. doi: 10.3390/ijns10010005. Int J Neonatal Screen. 2024. PMID: 38248633 Free PMC article.
-
Reducing False-Positive Results in Newborn Screening Using Machine Learning.Int J Neonatal Screen. 2020 Mar;6(1):16. doi: 10.3390/ijns6010016. Epub 2020 Mar 3. Int J Neonatal Screen. 2020. PMID: 32190768 Free PMC article.
-
Neonatal Screening for Cystic Fibrosis in Hungary-First-Year Experiences.Int J Neonatal Screen. 2023 Aug 23;9(3):47. doi: 10.3390/ijns9030047. Int J Neonatal Screen. 2023. PMID: 37754773 Free PMC article.
-
Initial Evaluation of Prospective and Parallel Assessments of Cystic Fibrosis Newborn Screening Protocols in Eastern Andalusia: IRT/IRT versus IRT/PAP/IRT.Int J Neonatal Screen. 2019 Sep 3;5(3):32. doi: 10.3390/ijns5030032. eCollection 2019 Sep. Int J Neonatal Screen. 2019. PMID: 33072991 Free PMC article.
-
Cystic Fibrosis Newborn Screening in Austria Using PAP and the Numeric Product of PAP and IRT Concentrations as Second-Tier Parameters.Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Feb 13;11(2):299. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11020299. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021. PMID: 33668470 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous