Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2012 Sep;50(9):2846-56.
doi: 10.1128/JCM.00937-12. Epub 2012 Jun 27.

Progress in antifungal susceptibility testing of Candida spp. by use of Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute broth microdilution methods, 2010 to 2012

Affiliations
Review

Progress in antifungal susceptibility testing of Candida spp. by use of Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute broth microdilution methods, 2010 to 2012

M A Pfaller et al. J Clin Microbiol. 2012 Sep.

Abstract

Antifungal susceptibility testing of Candida has been standardized and refined and now may play a useful role in managing Candida infections. Important new developments include validation of 24-h reading times for all antifungal agents and the establishment of species-specific epidemiological cutoff values (ECVs) for the systemically active antifungal agents and both common and uncommon species of Candida. The clinical breakpoints (CBPs) for fluconazole, voriconazole, and the echinocandins have been revised to provide species-specific interpretive criteria for the six most common species. The revised CBPs not only are predictive of clinical outcome but also provide a more sensitive means of identifying those strains with acquired or mutational resistance mechanisms. This brief review serves as an update on the new developments in the antifungal susceptibility testing of Candida spp. using Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) broth microdilution (BMD) methods.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alexander BD, et al. 2005. Candida glabrata fungemia in transplant patients receiving voriconazole after fluconazole. Transplantation 80:868–871 doi:10.1097/01.tp.0000173771.47698.7b - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arendrup MC, Denning DW. 2007. Does one voriconazole breakpoint suit all Candida species? J. Clin. Microbiol. 45:2093–2094 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arendrup MC, Kahlmeter G, Rodriguez-Tudela JL, Donnelly JP. 2009. Breakpoints for susceptibility testing should not divide wild-type distribution of important target species. Antimirob. Agents Chemother. 53:1628–1629 doi:10.1128/AAC.01624-08 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arendrup MC, et al. 2010. Echinocandin susceptibility testing of Candida spp.: comparison of EUCAST EDef 7.1, CLSI M27–A3, Etest, disk diffusion, and agar dilution methods with RPMI and isosensitest media. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 54:426–439 doi:10.1128/AAC.01256-09 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arendrup MC, et al. 2011. Diagnostic issues, clinical characteristics, and outcomes for patients with fungemia. J. Clin. Microbiol. 49:3300–3308 - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances