Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2013 Feb;48(1):236-52.
doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2012.01443.x. Epub 2012 Jun 28.

Abortion providers' experiences with Medicaid abortion coverage policies: a qualitative multistate study

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Abortion providers' experiences with Medicaid abortion coverage policies: a qualitative multistate study

Amanda Dennis et al. Health Serv Res. 2013 Feb.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the implementation of state Medicaid abortion policies and the impact of these policies on abortion clients and abortion providers.

Data source: From 2007 to 2010, in-depth interviews were conducted with representatives of 70 abortion-providing facilities in 15 states.

Study design: In-depth interviews focused on abortion providers' perceptions regarding Medicaid and their experiences working with Medicaid and securing reimbursement in cases that should receive federal funding: rape, incest, and life endangerment.

Data extraction: Data were transcribed verbatim before being coded.

Principal findings: In two study states, abortion providers reported that 97 percent of submitted claims for qualifying cases were funded. Success receiving reimbursement was attributed to streamlined electronic billing procedures, timely claims processing, and responsive Medicaid staff. Abortion providers in the other 13 states reported reimbursement for 36 percent of qualifying cases. Providers reported difficulties obtaining reimbursement due to unclear rejections of qualifying claims, complex billing procedures, lack of knowledgeable Medicaid staff with whom billing problems could be discussed, and low and slow reimbursement rates.

Conclusions: Poor state-level implementation of Medicaid coverage of abortion policies creates barriers for women seeking abortion. Efforts to ensure policies are implemented appropriately would improve women's health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Blanchfield BB, Heffernan JL, Osgood B, Sheehan RR, Meyer GS. “Saving Billions of Dollars — and Physicians' Time — by Streamlining Billing Practices”. Health Affairs. 2010;29(6):1248–54. - PubMed
    1. Borchgrevink A, Snyder A, Gehshan S. 2008. “The Effects of Medicaid Reimbursement Rates on Access to Dental Care” [accessed on December 29, 2011]. Available at http://nashp.org/sites/default/files/CHCF_dental_rates.pdf?q=Files/CHCF_....
    1. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. 2011. “Financing and Reimbursement” [accessed on December 29, 2011]. Available at http://www.medicaid.gov/Medicaid-CHIP-Program-Information/By-Topics/Fina.... - PubMed
    1. Cohen JW, Spector WD. “The Effect of Medicaid Reimbursement on Quality of Care in Nursing Homes”. Journal of Health Economics. 1996;15(1):23–48. - PubMed
    1. Dennis A, Blanchard K. “A Mystery Caller Evaluation of Medicaid Staff Responses about State Coverage of Abortion Care”. Women's Health Issues. 2011;22(2):e143–8. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms