The use of multiple time point dynamic positron emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with oral/head and neck cancer does not predictably identify metastatic cervical lymph nodes
- PMID: 22742956
- DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2012.03.028
The use of multiple time point dynamic positron emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with oral/head and neck cancer does not predictably identify metastatic cervical lymph nodes
Abstract
Purpose: To determine whether the time course of 18-fluorine fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) activity in multiple consecutively obtained 18F-FDG positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) scans predictably identifies metastatic cervical adenopathy in patients with oral/head and neck cancer. It is hypothesized that the activity will increase significantly over time only in those lymph nodes harboring metastatic cancer.
Patients and methods: A prospective cohort study was performed whereby patients with oral/head and neck cancer underwent consecutive imaging at 9 time points with PET/CT from 60 to 115 minutes after injection with (18)F-FDG. The primary predictor variable was the status of the lymph nodes based on dynamic PET/CT imaging. Metastatic lymph nodes were defined as those that showed an increase greater than or equal to 10% over the baseline standard uptake values. The primary outcome variable was the pathologic status of the lymph node.
Results: A total of 2,237 lymph nodes were evaluated histopathologically in the 83 neck dissections that were performed in 74 patients. A total of 119 lymph nodes were noted to have hypermetabolic activity on the 90-minute (static) portion of the study and were able to be assessed by time points. When we compared the PET/CT time point (dynamic) data with the histopathologic analysis of the lymph nodes, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were 60.3%, 70.5%, 66.0%, 65.2%, and 65.5%, respectively.
Conclusions: The use of dynamic PET/CT imaging does not permit the ablative surgeon to depend only on the results of the PET/CT study to determine which patients will benefit from neck dissection. As such, we maintain that surgeons should continue to rely on clinical judgment and maintain a low threshold for executing neck dissection in patients with oral/head and neck cancer, including those patients with N0 neck designations.
Copyright © 2013 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Can 3'-Deoxy-3'-((18)F) Fluorothymidine Out Perform 2-Deoxy-2-((18)F) Fluoro-D-Glucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in the Diagnosis of Cervical Lymphadenopathy in Patients With Oral/Head and Neck Cancer?J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015 Jul;73(7):1420-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2015.01.002. Epub 2015 Jan 13. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015. PMID: 25869746
-
Diagnostic value of only 18F-fluorodeocyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography-positive lymph nodes in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012 Oct;147(4):692-8. doi: 10.1177/0194599812443040. Epub 2012 Apr 24. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012. PMID: 22535915
-
Change of maximum standardized uptake value slope in dynamic triphasic [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography distinguishes malignancy from postradiation inflammation in head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective trial.Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 Mar 1;91(3):472-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.11.002. Epub 2015 Jan 30. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015. PMID: 25680593 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic accuracy of F-18 FDG PET or PET/CT for detection of lymph node metastasis in clinically node negative head and neck cancer patients; A systematic review and meta-analysis.Am J Otolaryngol. 2019 Mar-Apr;40(2):297-305. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2018.10.013. Epub 2018 Oct 23. Am J Otolaryngol. 2019. PMID: 30473166
-
18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the assessment of occult primary head and neck cancers--an audit and review of published studies.Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2012 Apr;24(3):190-5. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2011.11.001. Epub 2011 Dec 17. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2012. PMID: 22183080 Review.
Cited by
-
Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in Oncology.Cancers (Basel). 2014 Sep 29;6(4):1821-89. doi: 10.3390/cancers6041821. Cancers (Basel). 2014. PMID: 25268160 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The role of PET/CT in the management of patients affected by head and neck tumors: a review of the literature.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Aug;273(8):1961-73. doi: 10.1007/s00405-015-3651-4. Epub 2015 May 14. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016. PMID: 25971995 Review.
-
Multicenter Trial of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Staging of Head and Neck Cancer and Negative Predictive Value and Surgical Impact in the N0 Neck: Results From ACRIN 6685.J Clin Oncol. 2019 Jul 10;37(20):1704-1712. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.01182. Epub 2019 Feb 15. J Clin Oncol. 2019. PMID: 30768363 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Imaging in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: the potential role of PET/MRI.Br J Radiol. 2014 Apr;87(1036):20130677. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20130677. Epub 2014 Feb 3. Br J Radiol. 2014. PMID: 24649835 Free PMC article. Review.
-
18F-FDG PET/CT oncologic imaging at extended injection-to-scan acquisition time intervals derived from a single-institution 18F-FDG-directed surgery experience: feasibility and quantification of 18F-FDG accumulation within 18F-FDG-avid lesions and background tissues.BMC Cancer. 2014 Jun 19;14:453. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-453. BMC Cancer. 2014. PMID: 24942656 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials