Analytical tools for characterizing biopharmaceuticals and the implications for biosimilars
- PMID: 22743980
- PMCID: PMC3714370
- DOI: 10.1038/nrd3746
Analytical tools for characterizing biopharmaceuticals and the implications for biosimilars
Abstract
Biologics such as monoclonal antibodies are much more complex than small-molecule drugs, which raises challenging questions for the development and regulatory evaluation of follow-on versions of such biopharmaceutical products (also known as biosimilars) and their clinical use once patent protection for the pioneering biologic has expired. With the recent introduction of regulatory pathways for follow-on versions of complex biologics, the role of analytical technologies in comparing biosimilars with the corresponding reference product is attracting substantial interest in establishing the development requirements for biosimilars. Here, we discuss the current state of the art in analytical technologies to assess three characteristics of protein biopharmaceuticals that regulatory authorities have identified as being important in development strategies for biosimilars: post-translational modifications, three-dimensional structures and protein aggregation.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare competing financial interests.
Figures
References
-
- Walsh G. Biopharmaceutical benchmarks 2010. Nature Biotech. 2010;28:917–924. This comprehensive survey on the biopharmaceutical marketplace, carried out every 4 years, offers an overview of the key trends in the industry and new biopharmaceutical approvals. - PubMed
-
- Lawrence S. Billion dollar babies — biotech drugs as blockbusters. Nature Biotech. 2007;25:380–382. - PubMed
-
- Erickson BE. Untangling biosimilars. Chem Eng News. 2010;88:25–27.
-
- Woodcock J, et al. The FDA’s assessment of follow-on protein products: a historical perspective. Nature Rev Drug Discov. 2007;6:437–442. - PubMed
-
- Kozlowski S, Woodcock J, Midthun K, Sherman RB. Developing the nation’s biosimilars program. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:385–388. References 4 and 5 are two papers that were written by regulators at the FDA; these two papers have summarized in a compact form the agency’s historical perspective on biosimilars — a perspective that became mostly encapsulated by the draft guidelines that were later issued. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
