Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2012 Jun 28:2012:bcr1220115469.
doi: 10.1136/bcr.12.2011.5469.

Myopericarditis in giant cell arteritis: case report of diagnostic dilemma and review of literature

Affiliations
Case Reports

Myopericarditis in giant cell arteritis: case report of diagnostic dilemma and review of literature

Jagdish Ramachandran Nair et al. BMJ Case Rep. .

Abstract

Giant cell arteritis (GCA), also known as granulomatous arteritis is a systemic vasculitis mainly affecting extra cranial branches of carotid arteries. It can rarely affect other vascular beds causing thoracic aorta aneurysm, dissection and rarely cause myocardial infarction through coronary arteritis. It can cause considerable diagnostic dilemma due to varied clinical presentations. The authors report an illustrative case of a 70-year-old woman with GCA who developed symptoms suggestive of acute myocardial infarction with chest pain, localised ST-T changes and echocardiographic left ventricular dysfunction. However, cardiac troponin T biomarkers and coronary angiography were normal. Her symptoms subsided with steroid treatment. Cardiac symptoms at first presentation of GCA are unusual.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) ECGs on admission and changes over initial 5 days. (B) ECG 1 year later.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Sequential echocardiography – apical four chamber view (LV, left ventricle; LA, left atrium; RA, right atrium). (A) Three days later – lower septum and apical hypokinesia (AH), left ventricular ejection fraction of 40% and no significant pericardial effusion, (B) 6 weeks later – improvement in LV function and development of small pericardial effusion (PerE), (C) 7 weeks later – large pericardial effusion predominantly over right heart (arrows pointing to PerE), (D) 3 months later – no pericardial effusion.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Sequential echocardiography – subcostal view (LV, left ventricle, LA, left atrium, RA, right atrium). (A) Three days later – no significant pericardial effusion, (B) 6 weeks later – small pericardial effusion (PerE), (C) 7 weeks later – large pericardial effusion especially over right heart, (D) 3 months later – no pericardial effusion.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Coronary angiogram: normal coronary arteries and left ventricular (LV) function.

References

    1. Lie JT, Failoni DD, Davis DC., JrTemporal arteritis with giant cell aortitis, coronary arteritis, and myocardial infarction. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1986;110:857–60. - PubMed
    1. Hahn EA, Hartz VL, Moon TE, et al. The Myocarditis Treatment Trial: design, methods and patients enrollment. Eur Heart J 1995;16(Suppl 0):162–7. - PubMed
    1. Hunder GG, Bloch DA, Michel BA, et al. The American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of giant cell arteritis. Arthritis Rheum 1990;33:1122–8. - PubMed
    1. Allison MC, Gallagher PJ. Temporal artery biopsy and corticosteroid treatment. Ann Rheum Dis 1984;43:416–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dasgupta B, Borg FA, Hassan N, et al. ; BSR and BHPR Standards, Guidelines and Audit Working Group. BSR and BHPR guidelines for the management of giant cell arteritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2010;49:1594–7. - PubMed

Publication types