Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2012 Jul 10;79(2):159-62.
doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31825f04ea. Epub 2012 Jun 27.

Importance of SPP1 genotype as a covariate in clinical trials in Duchenne muscular dystrophy

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Importance of SPP1 genotype as a covariate in clinical trials in Duchenne muscular dystrophy

Luca Bello et al. Neurology. .

Abstract

Objective: To test the effect of the single nucleotide polymorphism -66 T>G (rs28357094) in the osteopontin gene (SPP1) on functional measures over 12 months in Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD).

Methods: This study was conducted on a cohort of ambulatory patients with DMD from a network of Italian neuromuscular centers, evaluated longitudinally with the north star ambulatory assessment (NSAA) and the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) at study entry and after 12 months. Genotype at rs28357094 was determined after completion of the clinical evaluations. Patients were stratified in 2 groups according to a dominant model (TT homozygotes vs TG heterozygotes and GG homozygotes) and clinical data were retrospectively compared between groups.

Results: Eighty patients were selected (age 4.1-19.3 years; mean 8.3 ± 2.7 SD). There were no differences in age or steroid treatment between the 2 subgroups. Paired t test showed a significant difference in both NSAA (p = 0.013) and 6MWT (p = 0.03) between baseline and follow-up after 12 months in patients with DMD carrying the G allele. The difference was not significant in the T subgroup. The analysis of covariance using age and baseline values as covariate and SPP1 genotype as fixed effect showed that these parameters are significantly correlated with the 12-month values.

Conclusions: These data provide evidence of the role of SPP1 genotype as a disease modifier in DMD and support its relevance in the selection of homogeneous groups of patients for future clinical trials.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure
Figure. Patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy carrying the G allele at rs28357094 deteriorated faster than patients carrying the T allele
The mean values for North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA) (A) and 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) (B) at T0 and T12 in the T and G subgroups are shown. T0–T12 mean differences in NSAA and 6MWT are significant only in the G subgroup of patients. Vertical bars represent 95% confidence intervals. A scatterplot of T0–T12 changes in NSAA (C) and 6MWT (D) in the T and G subgroups are shown. The superimposed linear regression shows a steeper decline in the G subgroup (NSAA slope estimates: T −0.17, G −1.12, SE: 0.13, p < 0.001; 6MWT slope estimates: T −5.76, G −14.44, SE 2.02, p < 0.001).

References

    1. Scatena M, Liaw L, Giachelli CM. Osteopontin: a multifunctional molecule regulating chronic inflammation and vascular disease. Arterioscl Thromb Vasc Biol 2007; 27: 2302– 2309 - PubMed
    1. Uaesoontrachoon K, Yoo HJ, Tudor EM, Pike RN, Mackie EJ, Pagel CN. Osteopontin and skeletal muscle myoblasts: association with muscle regeneration and regulation of myoblast function in vitro. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2008; 40: 2303– 2314 - PubMed
    1. Vetrone SA, Montecino-Rodriguez E, Kudryashova E, et al. Osteopontin promotes fibrosis in dystrophic mouse muscle by modulating immune cell subsets and intramuscular TGF-beta. J Clin Invest 2009; 119: 1583– 1594 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pegoraro E, Hoffman EP, Piva L, et al. SPP1 genotype is a determinant of disease severity in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Neurology 2011; 76: 219– 226 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nelson SF, Griggs RC. Predicting the severity of Duchenne muscular dystrophy: implications for treatment. Neurology 2011; 76: 208– 209 - PubMed

Publication types