Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Dec;19(6):513-7.
doi: 10.1007/s10140-012-1059-7. Epub 2012 Jun 29.

Eliminating routine oral contrast use for CT in the emergency department: impact on patient throughput and diagnosis

Affiliations

Eliminating routine oral contrast use for CT in the emergency department: impact on patient throughput and diagnosis

Robin B Levenson et al. Emerg Radiol. 2012 Dec.

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the effect of eliminating routine oral contrast use for abdominopelvic (AP) computed tomography (CT) on emergency department (ED) patient throughput and diagnosis. Retrospective analysis was performed on patients undergoing AP CT during 2-month periods prior to and following oral contrast protocol change in an urban, tertiary care ED. Patients with inflammatory bowel disease, prior gastrointestinal tract-altering surgery, or lean body habitus continued to receive oral contrast. Oral contrast was otherwise eliminated from the AP CT protocol. Patients were excluded if they would not have typically received oral contrast, regardless of the intervention. Data recorded include patient demographics, ED length of stay (LOS), time from order to CT, 72-h ED return, and repeat imaging. Two thousand and one ED patients (1,014 before and 987 after protocol change) underwent AP CT during the study period. Six hundred seven pre-intervention and 611 post-intervention were eligible for oral contrast and included. Of these, 95 % received oral contrast prior to the intervention and 42 % thereafter. After the intervention, mean ED LOS among oral contrast eligible patients decreased by 97 min, P < 0.001. Mean time from order to CT decreased by 66 min, P < 0.001. No patient with CT negative for acute findings had additional subsequent AP imaging within 72 h at our institution that led to a change in diagnosis. Eliminating routine oral contrast use for AP CT in the ED may be successful in decreasing LOS and time from order to CT without demonstrated compromise in acute patient diagnosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. World J Surg. 2010 Apr;34(4):699-703 - PubMed
    1. Radiology. 1999 Nov;213(2):341-6 - PubMed
    1. Emerg Radiol. 2006 Oct;13(1):25-30 - PubMed
    1. Emerg Radiol. 2010 Jul;17(4):267-73 - PubMed
    1. Emerg Radiol. 2006 May;12(4):150-7 - PubMed