Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Sep-Oct;19(5):800-8.
doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000775. Epub 2012 Jun 28.

Automatic discourse connective detection in biomedical text

Affiliations

Automatic discourse connective detection in biomedical text

Balaji Polepalli Ramesh et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 Sep-Oct.

Abstract

Objective: Relation extraction in biomedical text mining systems has largely focused on identifying clause-level relations, but increasing sophistication demands the recognition of relations at discourse level. A first step in identifying discourse relations involves the detection of discourse connectives: words or phrases used in text to express discourse relations. In this study supervised machine-learning approaches were developed and evaluated for automatically identifying discourse connectives in biomedical text.

Materials and methods: Two supervised machine-learning models (support vector machines and conditional random fields) were explored for identifying discourse connectives in biomedical literature. In-domain supervised machine-learning classifiers were trained on the Biomedical Discourse Relation Bank, an annotated corpus of discourse relations over 24 full-text biomedical articles (~112,000 word tokens), a subset of the GENIA corpus. Novel domain adaptation techniques were also explored to leverage the larger open-domain Penn Discourse Treebank (~1 million word tokens). The models were evaluated using the standard evaluation metrics of precision, recall and F1 scores.

Results and conclusion: Supervised machine-learning approaches can automatically identify discourse connectives in biomedical text, and the novel domain adaptation techniques yielded the best performance: 0.761 F1 score. A demonstration version of the fully implemented classifier BioConn is available at: http://bioconn.askhermes.org.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Frequency of the tokens in the Biomedical Discourse Relation Bank (BioDRB) corpus and their frequency of as connectives.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Sample parse tree.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The graph of performance of Hybrid classifier over different distributions of the connectives. BioDRB, Biomedical Discourse Relation Bank; PDTB, Penn Discourse Treebank.

References

    1. Zheng J, Chapman WW, Crowley RS, et al. Coreference resolution: a review of general methodologies and applications in the clinical domain. J Biomed Inform 2011;44:1113–22 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Prasad R, Dinesh N, Lee A, et al. The penn discourse treebank 2.0. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2008). Marrakech, Morocco, 2008:2961–8 Organised by ELRA, the European Language Resources Association, with the collaboration of major international institutions and organisations.
    1. Marcu D. Improving summarization through rhetorical parsing tuning. In: The 6th Workshop on Very Large Corpora; Montreal, Canada. New Brunswick, NY: The Association for Computational Linguistics SIGDAT, 1998:206–15
    1. Hovy EH. Automated discourse generation using discourse structure relations. In: Artificial Intelligence, Volume 63. 1993:341–85
    1. Hernault H, Piwek P, Prendinger H, et al. Generating dialogues for virtual agents using nested textual coherence relations. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents; Tokyo, Japan. Tokyo, Japan: International Information Science Foundation, 2008:139–45

Publication types