Does cement-induced sulfate limitation account for Burgess Shale-type preservation?
- PMID: 22745175
- PMCID: PMC3396523
- DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1206878109
Does cement-induced sulfate limitation account for Burgess Shale-type preservation?
Conflict of interest statement
The author declares no conflict of interest.
Comment on
-
Mechanism for Burgess Shale-type preservation.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Apr 3;109(14):5180-4. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1111784109. Epub 2012 Mar 5. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012. PMID: 22392974 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Gabbott SE, Zalasiewicz J, Collins D. Sedimentation of the Phyllopod Bed within the Cambrian Burgess Shale Formation of British Columbia. J Geol Soc London. 2008;165:307–318.
-
- Hough ML, et al. A major sulphur isotope event at c. 510 Ma: a possible anoxia–extinction–volcanism connection during the Early–Middle Cambrian transition? Terra Nova. 2006;18:257–263.
-
- Kristensen E, Ahmed SI, Devol AH. Aerobic and anaerobic decomposition of organic matter in marine sediment: Which is fastest? Limnol Oceanogr. 1995;40:1430–1437.
-
- Henwood A. Exceptional preservation of dipteran flight muscle and the taphonomy of insects in amber. Palaios. 1992;7:203–212.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
