Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012;7(6):e39018.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039018. Epub 2012 Jun 20.

ALCAM (CD166) expression and serum levels in pancreatic cancer

Affiliations

ALCAM (CD166) expression and serum levels in pancreatic cancer

Michael Tachezy et al. PLoS One. 2012.

Abstract

Background: This study was conducted to evaluate the expression of the activated leukocyte cell adhesion molecule (ALCAM) in pancreatic cancer (PAC) and to determine whether or not the ectodomain shedding of ALCAM (s-ALCAM) could serve as a biomarker in the peripheral blood of PAC patients.

Material and methods: Tissue specimens and blood sera of patients with PAC (n = 264 and n = 116, respectively) and the sera of 115 patients with chronic pancreatitis (CP) were analyzed via ALCAM immunohistochemistry and s-ALCAM ELISA tests. Results were correlated with clinical, histopathological, and patient survival data (Chi-square test, Kaplan-Meier analysis, log-rank test, respectively).

Results: ALCAM was expressed in the majority of PAC lesions. Immunohistochemistry and serum ELISA tests revealed no association between ALCAM expression in primary tumors or s-ALCAM and clinical or histopathological data. Neither ALCAM nor s-ALCAM showed a significant impact regarding overall survival (p = 0.261 and p = 0.660, respectively). S-ALCAM serum levels were significantly elevated compared to the sera of CP patients (p<0.001). The sensitivity of s-ALCAM in detecting PAC was 58.6% at a specificity of 73.9% (AUC = 0.69).

Conclusions: ALCAM is expressed in the majority of PAC lesions, but statistical analysis revealed no association with clinical or pathological data. Although significantly elevated in patients with PAC, the sensitivity and specificity of the s-ALCAM serum quantification test was low. Therefore, its potential as a novel diagnostic marker for PAC remains elusive and further investigations are required.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Representative immunohistochemical ALCAM stains of primary pancreatic cancer (PAC) lesions.
(A) and (B) strong ALCAM expression, (C) and (D) medium and (E) no expression. (F) Healthy pancreatic tissue. (G) Complete scan of the PAC tissue microarray.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Kaplan-Meier overall survival analysis.
(A) Immunohistochemical ALCAM staining of primary pancreatic cancer specimens and (B) low and high s-ALCAM serum levels (patients who died during the first 30 days after surgery were excluded).
Figure 3
Figure 3. S-ALCAM serum analysis.
(A) s-ALCAM serum levels of the patients with pancreatic cancer (PAC) and chronic pancreatitis (CP) and healthy control blood donors (p<0.001). (B) Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of s-ALCAM for the diagnosis of PAC versus CP patients.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Li D, Xie K, Wolff R, Abbruzzese JL. Pancreatic cancer. Lancet. 2004;363:1049–1057. - PubMed
    1. Kleeff J, Friess H. Nonmetastatic pancreatic cancer: many trials, little progress. J Clin Oncol 26: 3100; author reply 3100-a-3101. 2008. - PubMed
    1. Kindler HL, Niedzwiecki D, Hollis D, Sutherland S, Schrag D, et al. Gemcitabine plus bevacizumab compared with gemcitabine plus placebo in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: phase III trial of the Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB 80303). J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:3617–3622. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rivera F, Lopez-Tarruella S, Vega-Villegas ME, Salcedo M. Treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer: from gemcitabine single agent to combinations and targeted therapy. Cancer Treat Rev. 2009;35:335–339. - PubMed
    1. Philip PA, Benedetti J, Corless CL, Wong R, O’Reilly EM, et al. Phase III study comparing gemcitabine plus cetuximab versus gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: Southwest Oncology Group-directed intergroup trial S0205. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:3605–3610. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms