Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting oncologic outcome after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
- PMID: 22749851
- DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.047
Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting oncologic outcome after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
Abstract
Context: Despite the large diffusion of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), literature and data on the oncologic outcome of RARP are limited.
Objective: Evaluate lymph node yield, positive surgical margins (PSMs), use of adjuvant therapy, and biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival following RARP and perform a cumulative analysis of all studies comparing the oncologic outcomes of RARP and retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP) or laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP).
Evidence acquisition: A systematic review of the literature was performed in August 2011, searching Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases. A free-text protocol using the term radical prostatectomy was applied. The following limits were used: humans; gender (male); and publications dating from January 1, 2008. A cumulative analysis was conducted using Review Manager software v.4.2 (Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK) and Stata 11.0 SE software (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA).
Evidence synthesis: We retrieved 79 papers evaluating oncologic outcomes following RARP. The mean PSM rate was 15% in all comers and 9% in pathologically localized cancers, with some tumor characteristics being the most relevant predictors of PSMs. Several surgeon-related characteristics or procedure-related issues may play a major role in PSM rates. With regard to BCR, the very few papers with a follow-up duration >5 yr demonstrated 7-yr BCR-free survival estimates of approximately 80%. Finally, all the cumulative analyses comparing RARP with RRP and comparing RARP with LRP demonstrated similar overall PSM rates (RARP vs RRP: odds ratio [OR]: 1.21; p=0.19; RARP vs LRP: OR: 1.12; p=0.47), pT2 PSM rates (RARP vs RRP: OR: 1.25; p=0.31; RARP vs LRP: OR: 0.99; p=0.97), and BCR-free survival estimates (RARP vs RRP: hazard ratio [HR]: 0.9; p=0.526; RARP vs LRP: HR: 0.5; p=0.141), regardless of the surgical approach.
Conclusions: PSM rates are similar following RARP, RRP, and LRP. The few data available on BCR from high-volume centers are promising, but definitive comparisons with RRP or LRP are not currently possible. Finally, significant data on cancer-specific mortality are not currently available.
Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Comment in
-
Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy - fake innovation or the real deal?Eur Urol. 2012 Sep;62(3):365-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.06.002. Epub 2012 Jun 12. Eur Urol. 2012. PMID: 22705383 No abstract available.
-
Re: Giacomo Novara, Vincenzo Ficarra, Simone Mocellin, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting oncologic outcome after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2012;62:382-404.Eur Urol. 2013 Feb;63(2):e27-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.11.028. Epub 2012 Nov 16. Eur Urol. 2013. PMID: 23182552 No abstract available.
-
Reply to Stefano C.M. Picozzi, Cristian Ricci and Luca Carmignani's letter to the editor re: Giacomo Novara, Vincenzo Ficarra, Simone Mocellin, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting oncologic outcome after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2012;62:382-404.Eur Urol. 2013 Feb;63(2):e29-31. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.11.026. Epub 2012 Nov 19. Eur Urol. 2013. PMID: 23218764 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.Eur Urol. 2012 Sep;62(3):405-17. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.045. Epub 2012 Jun 1. Eur Urol. 2012. PMID: 22749852
-
Systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes and complications after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.Eur Urol. 2012 Sep;62(3):431-52. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.044. Epub 2012 Jun 2. Eur Urol. 2012. PMID: 22749853
-
Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting potency rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.Eur Urol. 2012 Sep;62(3):418-30. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.046. Epub 2012 Jun 1. Eur Urol. 2012. PMID: 22749850
-
Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies.Eur Urol. 2009 May;55(5):1037-63. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.01.036. Epub 2009 Jan 25. Eur Urol. 2009. PMID: 19185977
-
Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy for the treatment of localised prostate cancer.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 12;9(9):CD009625. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009625.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28895658 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Oncological results at 2 years after robotic radical prostatectomy - the Romanian experience.Cent European J Urol. 2016;69(1):48-52. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2016.640. Epub 2016 Jan 15. Cent European J Urol. 2016. PMID: 27123326 Free PMC article.
-
[Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy].Urologe A. 2015 Feb;54(2):178-82. doi: 10.1007/s00120-014-3665-3. Urologe A. 2015. PMID: 25616764 Review. German.
-
Robotic-assisted vs. open radical prostatectomy: an update to the never-ending debate.Transl Androl Urol. 2018 Mar;7(Suppl 1):S120-S123. doi: 10.21037/tau.2017.12.20. Transl Androl Urol. 2018. PMID: 29644178 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Complete puborectalis, puboperinealis muscle and urethral rhabdomyosphincter preservation in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Anatomical landmarks to achieve early urinary continence.Int J Urol. 2020 Jun;27(6):525-536. doi: 10.1111/iju.14228. Epub 2020 Apr 16. Int J Urol. 2020. PMID: 32301194 Free PMC article.
-
Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Another Canadian experience.Can Urol Assoc J. 2014 Mar;8(3-4):98-9. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.2083. Can Urol Assoc J. 2014. PMID: 24839476 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous