Loop ileostomy closure after laparoscopic versus open surgery: is there a difference?
- PMID: 22752281
- DOI: 10.1007/s00464-012-2422-1
Loop ileostomy closure after laparoscopic versus open surgery: is there a difference?
Abstract
Background: Temporary loop ileostomy is commonly performed to protect the distal anastomosis during both open and laparoscopic colectomies. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of initial open and laparoscopic colorectal resection on the outcomes of ileostomy closure.
Methods: After institutional review board approval, all patients who underwent loop ileostomy closure from January 2008 to July 2012 were identified. The patients' demographics, diagnosis, American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) classification, type of resection, approach (laparoscopic [LS] or open [OS] surgery), use of anti-adhesion barrier, and ileostomy closure outcomes were obtained from a chart review. The outcomes of ileostomy closure after LS and OS colorectal resections were compared using Chi-square for categorical variables and Student's t test for continuous variables.
Results: The study identified 351 patients with a mean age of 51 years: 145 patients (41.2%) in the LS group and 206 patients (58.8%) in the OS group. The most common procedures performed were total proctocolectomy with ileal J pouch anal anastomosis (109 patients: 49 LS, 60 OS) and restorative proctectomy (99 patients: 34 LS, 65 OS). At the time of ileostomy closure, the patients in the LS group had a significantly shorter mean operative time (LS 60.9 vs OS 82.6 min; p < 0.001) and a shorter hospital stay (LS 4.9 vs OS 5.8 days; p = 0.042). The overall complication rate was 20.1% (70 patients), and the rate in the OS group was significantly higher (p = 0.028). The most common complications were postoperative ileus (41 patients: 13 LS vs 28 OS) and enterocutaneous fistula (5 patients, all in the OS group).
Conclusions: Loop ileostomy closure after laparoscopic colorectal surgery is associated with a significantly shorter operative time and hospital stay as well as a lower rate of postoperative complications. Superior outcomes after loop ileostomy closure lend further support to the use of laparoscopy.
Similar articles
-
Outcomes of laparoscopic and open restorative proctocolectomy.Br J Surg. 2014 Aug;101(9):1160-5. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9535. Epub 2014 Jun 10. Br J Surg. 2014. PMID: 24916184
-
Early postoperative outcomes of diverting loop ileostomy closure surgery following laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery.Surg Endosc. 2021 Jun;35(6):2509-2514. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07662-w. Epub 2020 May 26. Surg Endosc. 2021. PMID: 32458288
-
[Open vs. laparoscopic loop ileostomy clousure after colorectal surgery: retrospective analysis].Rev Invest Clin. 2009 Nov-Dec;61(6):461-5. Rev Invest Clin. 2009. PMID: 20184126 Spanish.
-
A systematic review and meta-analysis of laparoscopic vs open restorative proctocolectomy.Colorectal Dis. 2013 Jul;15(7):e340-51. doi: 10.1111/codi.12231. Colorectal Dis. 2013. PMID: 23560590
-
Laparoscopic versus open ileostomy closure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of postoperative outcomes.Int J Colorectal Dis. 2025 May 5;40(1):109. doi: 10.1007/s00384-025-04897-8. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2025. PMID: 40323516 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Can physiological stimulation prior to ileostomy closure reduce postoperative ileus? A prospective multicenter pilot study.Tech Coloproctol. 2022 Aug;26(8):645-653. doi: 10.1007/s10151-022-02620-1. Epub 2022 May 21. Tech Coloproctol. 2022. PMID: 35596903
-
Incidence and predictors of postoperative ileus after loop ileostomy closure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Surg Endosc. 2019 Aug;33(8):2430-2443. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06794-y. Epub 2019 Apr 17. Surg Endosc. 2019. PMID: 31020433
-
IMMEDIATE AND LATE RESULTS OF ILEOSTOMY CLOSURE IN PATIENTS WITH FAMILIAL ADENOMATOUS POLYPOSIS UNDERGOING RESTORATIVE PROCTOCOLECTOMY BY OPEN OR LAPAROSCOPIC APPROACHES.Arq Gastroenterol. 2025 Jul 21;62:e25017. doi: 10.1590/S0004-2803.24612025-017. eCollection 2025. Arq Gastroenterol. 2025. PMID: 40699046 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical application of the B-type sutured ileostomy in robotic-assisted low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis.J Robot Surg. 2024 Apr 5;18(1):159. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01924-8. J Robot Surg. 2024. PMID: 38578352 Clinical Trial.
-
Laparoscopic versus open fecal diversion: does laparoscopy offer better outcomes in short term?Tech Coloproctol. 2015 May;19(5):293-300. doi: 10.1007/s10151-015-1295-4. Epub 2015 Mar 22. Tech Coloproctol. 2015. PMID: 25796388
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical