Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jul;17(5):783-96.
doi: 10.1007/s10995-012-1068-x.

Post-disaster reproductive health outcomes

Affiliations

Post-disaster reproductive health outcomes

Marianne E Zotti et al. Matern Child Health J. 2013 Jul.

Abstract

We examined methodological issues in studies of disaster-related effects on reproductive health outcomes and fertility among women of reproductive age and infants in the United States (US). We conducted a systematic literature review of 1,635 articles and reports published in peer-reviewed journals or by the government from January 1981 through December 2010. We classified the studies using three exposure types: (1) physical exposure to toxicants; (2) psychological trauma; and (3) general exposure to disaster. Fifteen articles met our inclusion criteria concerning research focus and design. Overall studies pertained to eight different disasters, with most (n = 6) focused on the World Trade Center attack. Only one study examined pregnancy loss, i.e., occurrence of spontaneous abortions post-disaster. Most studies focused on associations between disaster and adverse birth outcomes, but two studies pertained only to post-disaster fertility while another two examined it in addition to adverse birth outcomes. In most studies disaster-affected populations were assumed to have experienced psychological trauma, but exposure to trauma was measured in only four studies. Furthermore, effects of both physical exposure to toxicants and psychological trauma on disaster-affected populations were examined in only one study. Effects on birth outcomes were not consistently demonstrated, and study methodologies varied widely. Even so, these studies suggest an association between disasters and reproductive health and highlight the need for further studies to clarify associations. We postulate that post-disaster surveillance among pregnant women could improve our understanding of effects of disaster on the reproductive health of US pregnant women.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Cruz M, editor. Natural/environmental disasters. CDC Public Health Readiness Certificate Program. CDC; Atlanta, GA: Sep 22-25, 2008. 2008.
    1. FEMA FEMA declared disasters by year or state. 2011 [Cited 2011 March 4]; Available from: http://www.fema.gov/news/disaster_totals_annual.fema.
    1. Ross T, Lott N. A climatology of 1980–2003 extreme weather and climate events. National Climatic Data Center; Ashville, NC: 2003. Technical Report No. 2003-01.
    1. Peacock WG, Kunreuther H, Hooke WH, Cutter SL, Chang SE, Berke PR. Toward a resiliency and vulnerability observatory network: RAVON. 2008. 2008 HRRC reports: 08-02R.
    1. Center NCD Billion dollar U.S. weather/climate disasters. 2011 [Cited 2011 October 20]; Available from: http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/reports/billionz.html.

Publication types