[Influence of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurements following Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK)]
- PMID: 22752628
- DOI: 10.1007/s00347-012-2623-y
[Influence of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurements following Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK)]
Abstract
Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of increased corneal thickness after Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) on intraocular pressure (IOP) measured by four different techniques.
Methods: In this study 30 eyes from 30 patients with successful DSAEK treatment (group 1) and 30 eyes of 30 healthy subjects (group 2) were enrolled. The IOP was measured with iCare, IOPen, Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) and dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) techniques. Central corneal thickness (CCT) was measured by ultrasonic pachymetry. These data were used for statistical analysis.
Results: The mean IOP measured by GAT, DCT, iCare and IOPen was 13.2, 16.1, 12.5 and 14.2 mmHg in group 1 and 13.4, 14.4, 14.4 and 13.3 mmHg in group 2, respectively. Correlations between IOP and CCT were not statistically significant in either group.
Conclusion: The results of IOP measurements by the iCare, IOPen, GAT and DCT techniques seem to be unrelated to artificially thickened corneas after DSAEK. In spite of partially good correlation between the four techniques a direct exchange of the devices is not recommended on account of the wide dispersion of values.
Similar articles
-
Intraocular pressure measurement after DSAEK by iCare, Goldmann applanation and dynamic contour tonometry: A comparative study.J Fr Ophtalmol. 2016 Dec;39(10):822-828. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2016.09.009. Epub 2016 Nov 19. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2016. PMID: 27871779 Clinical Trial.
-
Intraocular pressure after Descemet's stripping and non-Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2011 Mar;55(2):98-102. doi: 10.1007/s10384-010-0916-8. Epub 2011 Mar 13. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2011. PMID: 21400052
-
Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry following Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK).Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2009 Apr;226(4):241-4. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1109242. Epub 2009 Apr 21. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2009. PMID: 19384775 Clinical Trial.
-
[Influence of corneal thickness in keratoconic corneas on IOP measurement with IOPen, iCare, dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry].Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2013 Jul;230(7):697-700. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1328408. Epub 2013 May 13. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2013. PMID: 23670524 German.
-
Comparison of iCare tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry in normal corneas and in eyes with automated lamellar and penetrating keratoplasty.Eye (Lond). 2011 May;25(5):642-50. doi: 10.1038/eye.2011.60. Epub 2011 Mar 25. Eye (Lond). 2011. PMID: 21436848 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Challenges in the complex management of post-keratoplasty glaucoma.Ther Adv Ophthalmol. 2021 Jul 20;13:25158414211031397. doi: 10.1177/25158414211031397. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec. Ther Adv Ophthalmol. 2021. PMID: 34350382 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Intraocular pressure elevation and post-DMEK glaucoma following Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2014 Dec;252(12):1947-54. doi: 10.1007/s00417-014-2757-5. Epub 2014 Aug 7. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2014. PMID: 25099676
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources