Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2012 Nov;109(11):1093-7.
doi: 10.1007/s00347-012-2623-y.

[Influence of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurements following Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK)]

[Article in German]
Affiliations
Comparative Study

[Influence of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurements following Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK)]

[Article in German]
M K J Klamann et al. Ophthalmologe. 2012 Nov.

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of increased corneal thickness after Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) on intraocular pressure (IOP) measured by four different techniques.

Methods: In this study 30 eyes from 30 patients with successful DSAEK treatment (group 1) and 30 eyes of 30 healthy subjects (group 2) were enrolled. The IOP was measured with iCare, IOPen, Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) and dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) techniques. Central corneal thickness (CCT) was measured by ultrasonic pachymetry. These data were used for statistical analysis.

Results: The mean IOP measured by GAT, DCT, iCare and IOPen was 13.2, 16.1, 12.5 and 14.2 mmHg in group 1 and 13.4, 14.4, 14.4 and 13.3 mmHg in group 2, respectively. Correlations between IOP and CCT were not statistically significant in either group.

Conclusion: The results of IOP measurements by the iCare, IOPen, GAT and DCT techniques seem to be unrelated to artificially thickened corneas after DSAEK. In spite of partially good correlation between the four techniques a direct exchange of the devices is not recommended on account of the wide dispersion of values.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cornea. 2006 Sep;25(8):987-90 - PubMed
    1. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004 Sep;45(9):3118-21 - PubMed
    1. Ophthalmology. 2006 Nov;113(11):1936-42 - PubMed
    1. Cornea. 2005 Jan;24(1):59-65 - PubMed
    1. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006 Mar;32(3):411-8 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources