Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2012 Aug;48(7):407-12.
doi: 10.1007/s11626-012-9528-6. Epub 2012 Jun 30.

In vitro effect of peas, Pisum pisum, and chickpeas, Cicer arietinum, on the immune system of gilthead seabream, Sparus aurata

Affiliations
Comparative Study

In vitro effect of peas, Pisum pisum, and chickpeas, Cicer arietinum, on the immune system of gilthead seabream, Sparus aurata

M A Henry et al. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim. 2012 Aug.

Abstract

The future for a sustainable aquaculture relies on the formulation of feed including alternatives to fish meal and fish oil that do not impair fish growth and that improve fish health status. Grain legumes such as field peas and chickpeas offer good sources of proteins, carbohydrates, fibers, vitamins, and minerals. The effect of peas and chickpeas on the immune system of seabream was assessed in vitro in order to detect any potential immunosuppressing problem. Peas was determined to be a better fishmeal alternative than chickpeas as they induced higher respiratory burst measured by the nitro blue tetrazolium assay and primed the Phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA)-stimulated intracellular respiratory burst whereas chickpeas neither directly stimulated respiratory burst nor primed it. However, when the intra- and extracellular respiratory burst activities were taken into account, high concentrations of peas inhibited the zymosan- and PMA-triggered chemiluminescence. This apparent reduction of the production of reactive oxygen species may reflect in fact the antioxidant activity of legumes. This, together with the absence of effect on the phagocytosis activity, suggested that peas are not immunosuppressing gilthead seabream. Further in vivo studies preferably comporting a bacterial challenge will have to ascertain the absence of immunosuppressing effect of these legumes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Parasite Immunol. 2009 Dec;31(12):729-40 - PubMed
    1. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2007 Mar;10(2):123-8 - PubMed
    1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Sep 8;106(36):15103-10 - PubMed
    1. Toxicon. 2004 Sep 15;44(4):385-403 - PubMed
    1. Immunopharmacology. 1999 Feb;41(2):147-55 - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources