Single-port cholecystectomy in obese patients: our experience and a review of the literature
- PMID: 22752683
- DOI: 10.1007/s00595-012-0238-1
Single-port cholecystectomy in obese patients: our experience and a review of the literature
Abstract
Purpose: The objective of the present study was to compare the postoperative outcomes between obese and normal-weight patients undergoing single-port cholecystectomy (SPC) for gallstone disease.
Methods: A prospectively maintained SPC-database was retrospectively analyzed, and the outcomes of obese [body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m(2)] and normal-weight patients were compared. All patients underwent SPC using the reusable X-Cone™ device.
Results: A total of 100 patients underwent SPC between July 2009 and September 2011. Seventeen obese patients (17 %) (median BMI 33.9 kg/m², range 30.0-38.8) were compared to 83 normal-weight patients (median BMI 24.1 kg/m², range 17.3-29.5). The length of the operation (median 75.5 min, range 42-156 vs. median 72.0 min, range 42-129; p = 0.51), conversion rate (N = 2 vs. N = 0; p = 1), postoperative complication rate (9.6 vs. 11.8%; p = 0.68), and postoperative hospital stay (median 3 days, range 1-14 vs. median 3 days, range 2-5; p = 0.74), were comparable for the normal-weight and obese patients.
Conclusion: The postoperative outcome of obese patients after SPC is not inferior to that of normal-weight patients undergoing the same operation. Therefore, the BMI should not be considered a key criterion in the patient selection for single-port surgery.
Similar articles
-
Single-access transumbilical laparoscopic appendectomy and cholecystectomy using new curved reusable instruments: a pilot feasibility study.Surg Endosc. 2011 Apr;25(4):1325-32. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1304-7. Epub 2010 Aug 31. Surg Endosc. 2011. PMID: 20809190
-
Multi-port versus single-port cholecystectomy: results of a multi-centre, randomised controlled trial (MUSIC trial).Surg Endosc. 2017 Jul;31(7):2872-2880. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5298-7. Epub 2016 Oct 24. Surg Endosc. 2017. PMID: 27778171 Clinical Trial.
-
Single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients of advanced age: why not?Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012 Aug;22(4):361-3. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31825af69a. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012. PMID: 22874689
-
The impact of body mass index on laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Taiwan: an oriental experience.J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2009;16(5):648-54. doi: 10.1007/s00534-009-0102-x. Epub 2009 Apr 23. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2009. PMID: 19387531
-
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with previous upper or lower abdominal surgery.Surg Endosc. 2004 Jan;18(1):97-101. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-9001-4. Epub 2003 Oct 23. Surg Endosc. 2004. PMID: 14569455 Review.
Cited by
-
Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy and overweight patients.Obes Surg. 2014 Jan;24(1):123-7. doi: 10.1007/s11695-013-1041-9. Obes Surg. 2014. PMID: 23929313
-
Single-Port Laparoscopic and Robotic Cholecystectomy in Obesity (>25 kg/m2).JSLS. 2019 Apr-Jun;23(2):e2019.00005. doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2019.00005. JSLS. 2019. PMID: 31148915 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of outcomes after single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy in relation to patient body mass index.JSLS. 2014 Jul-Sep;18(3):e2014.00048. doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2014.00048. JSLS. 2014. PMID: 25516701 Free PMC article.
-
Safety and feasibility of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy in obese patients.Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2016 Dec 24;13:34-37. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2016.12.048. eCollection 2017 Jan. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2016. PMID: 28070328 Free PMC article.
-
Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed by a single surgeon: findings of a randomized trial.Surg Today. 2016 Mar;46(3):313-8. doi: 10.1007/s00595-015-1182-7. Epub 2015 Jun 3. Surg Today. 2016. PMID: 26036221 Clinical Trial.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical