Outcome following evacuation of acute subdural haematomas: a comparison of craniotomy with decompressive craniectomy
- PMID: 22752713
- DOI: 10.1007/s00701-012-1428-8
Outcome following evacuation of acute subdural haematomas: a comparison of craniotomy with decompressive craniectomy
Abstract
Background: Acute subdural haematomas (ASDH) occur commonly following traumatic brain injury and may be evacuated by either craniotomy (CR) or decompressive craniectomy (DC). We reviewed a series of consecutive patients undergoing evacuation of a traumatic ASDH at a regional centre, comparing observed clinical outcomes (assessed by Glasgow Outcome Scale at six months) with those predicted by the CRASH-CT prognostic model.
Methods: Retrospective review of prospectively collected data.
Results: Ninety-one patients were identified (51 DC and 40 CR ). Eighty-five had available admission data sets from which predicted outcome could be calculated. The DC group were younger than the CR group (p = 0.015). The DC group also had a greater proportion of patients whose pre-intubation GCS was ≤8 (p = 0.001), with significant extracranial injuries (p = 0.001) and obliterated basal cisterns (p = 0.001) on their pre-operative CT scan. Bone flaps in the DC group (n = 45) were longer (mean 11.6 cm; 95 % CI: 11.1-12.1) in comparison to bone flaps in the CR (n = 34) group [(mean 10.2 cm; 95 % CI: 9.35 - 10.9); p = 0.0024] The mean CRASH-CT predicted risk of 14-day mortality and of unfavourable outcome at six months was significantly higher in the DC group compared with the CR group. Eighty-eight patients had available 6-month Glasgow Outcome Scale scores. Favourable outcomes were observed in 42 % of DC versus 45 % of CR (p = 0.83). The overall mortality rate was 38 % in DC versus 32 % in CR (p = 0.65). The standardised morbidity ratio (observed/expected unfavourable outcomes) was 0.75 (95 % CI: 0.51-1.07) for DC and 0.90 (95 % CI: 0.57-1.35) for CR.
Conclusions: CR and DC for traumatic ASDH are both commonly used for primary evacuation of ASDH. Primary DC may be more effective than CR for selected patients with ASDH. Class I evidence is required in order to refine the indications for DC following evacuation of ASDH.
Comment in
-
Letter to the editor: decompressive craniectomy for acute subdural hematoma.Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2013 Jan;155(1):185-6. doi: 10.1007/s00701-012-1530-y. Epub 2012 Oct 27. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2013. PMID: 23104583 No abstract available.
-
Decompressive craniectomy for acute subdural hematomas: time for a randomized trial.Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2013 Jan;155(1):187-8. doi: 10.1007/s00701-012-1531-x. Epub 2012 Nov 1. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2013. PMID: 23111498 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of craniotomy and decompressive craniectomy in severely head-injured patients with acute subdural hematoma.J Trauma. 2011 Dec;71(6):1632-6. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182367b3c. J Trauma. 2011. PMID: 22027888
-
The Association of Surgical Method with Outcomes of Acute Subdural Hematoma Patients: Experience with 643 Consecutive Patients.World Neurosurg. 2017 May;101:335-342. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.02.010. Epub 2017 Feb 13. World Neurosurg. 2017. PMID: 28216211
-
Cost-effectiveness of craniotomy versus decompressive craniectomy for UK patients with traumatic acute subdural haematoma.BMJ Open. 2024 Jun 16;14(6):e085084. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085084. BMJ Open. 2024. PMID: 38885989 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of Decompressive Craniectomy Versus Craniotomy for Evacuation of Subdural Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.J Surg Res. 2024 Oct;302:593-605. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.07.107. Epub 2024 Aug 23. J Surg Res. 2024. PMID: 39181026
-
Decompressive craniectomy versus craniotomy for acute subdural hematoma: Updated meta-analysis of real-world clinical outcome after RESCUE-ASDH trial.J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2024 Aug 1;97(2):299-304. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004243. Epub 2024 Jan 10. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2024. PMID: 38197651
Cited by
-
Transcranial direct current stimulation in patients after decompressive craniectomy: a finite element model to investigate factors affecting the cortical electric field.J Int Med Res. 2021 Feb;49(2):300060520942112. doi: 10.1177/0300060520942112. J Int Med Res. 2021. PMID: 33788619 Free PMC article.
-
Craniotomy size for traumatic acute subdural hematomas in elderly patients-same procedure for every age?Neurosurg Rev. 2022 Feb;45(1):459-465. doi: 10.1007/s10143-021-01548-8. Epub 2021 Apr 26. Neurosurg Rev. 2022. PMID: 33900496 Free PMC article.
-
Second- and Third-Tier Therapies for Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.J Clin Med. 2022 Aug 16;11(16):4790. doi: 10.3390/jcm11164790. J Clin Med. 2022. PMID: 36013029 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Prospective randomized evaluation of therapeutic decompressive craniectomy in severe traumatic brain injury with mass lesions (PRECIS): study protocol for a controlled trial.BMC Neurol. 2016 Jan 5;16:1. doi: 10.1186/s12883-015-0524-9. BMC Neurol. 2016. PMID: 26727957 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness of Craniectomy Versus Craniotomy in the Management of Acute Subdural Hematoma Patients: A Systematic Review.Cureus. 2024 Dec 16;16(12):e75842. doi: 10.7759/cureus.75842. eCollection 2024 Dec. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 39691407 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical