Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2012 Jul 17;109(29):11652-6.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1203647109. Epub 2012 Jul 2.

Economic impacts and impact dynamics of Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis) cotton in India

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Economic impacts and impact dynamics of Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis) cotton in India

Jonas Kathage et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. .

Abstract

Despite widespread adoption of genetically modified crops in many countries, heated controversies about their advantages and disadvantages continue. Especially for developing countries, there are concerns that genetically modified crops fail to benefit smallholder farmers and contribute to social and economic hardship. Many economic studies contradict this view, but most of them look at short-term impacts only, so that uncertainty about longer-term effects prevails. We address this shortcoming by analyzing economic impacts and impact dynamics of Bt cotton in India. Building on unique panel data collected between 2002 and 2008, and controlling for nonrandom selection bias in technology adoption, we show that Bt has caused a 24% increase in cotton yield per acre through reduced pest damage and a 50% gain in cotton profit among smallholders. These benefits are stable; there are even indications that they have increased over time. We further show that Bt cotton adoption has raised consumption expenditures, a common measure of household living standard, by 18% during the 2006-2008 period. We conclude that Bt cotton has created large and sustainable benefits, which contribute to positive economic and social development in India.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. James C. Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2011. ISAAA Brief 43. Ithaca, NY: ISAAA; 2011.
    1. Union of Concerned Scientists . Failure to Yield: Evaluating the Performance of Genetically Engineered Crops. Cambridge, MA: UCS Publications; 2009.
    1. Greenpeace . Economic Failures: Genetic Engineering Enforces Corporate Control of Agriculture. Amsterdam: Greenpeace International; 2010.
    1. Friends of the Earth . Who Benefits from GM Crops: An Industry Built on Myths. Amsterdam: Friends of the Earth International; 2011.
    1. Shiva V, Barker D, Lockhart C. The GMO Emperor Has No Clothes. Florence, Italy and New Delhi, India: Navdanya International; 2011.

Publication types

MeSH terms