Intrapatient cetuximab dose escalation in metastatic colorectal cancer according to the grade of early skin reactions: the randomized EVEREST study
- PMID: 22753904
- DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2011.40.9243
Intrapatient cetuximab dose escalation in metastatic colorectal cancer according to the grade of early skin reactions: the randomized EVEREST study
Abstract
Purpose: Skin toxicity in patients receiving cetuximab has been associated positively with clinical outcome in several tumor types. This study investigated the effect of cetuximab dose escalation in patients with irinotecan-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer who had developed no or mild skin reactions after 21 days of treatment at the standard dose. This article reports clinical and pharmacokinetic (PK) data.
Patients and methods: After 21 days of standard-dose cetuximab (400 mg/m(2) initial dose, then 250 mg/m(2) per week) plus irinotecan, patients with ≤ grade 1 skin reactions were randomly assigned to standard-dose (group A) or dose-escalated (to 500 mg/m(2) per week; group B) cetuximab. Patients with ≥ grade 2 skin reactions continued on standard-dose cetuximab plus irinotecan (group C).
Results: The intent-to-treat population comprised 157 patients. PK profiles reflected the dose increase and were predictable across the dose range investigated. Weekly cetuximab doses of up to 500 mg/m(2) were well tolerated, and grade 3 and 4 adverse events were generally comparable between treatment groups. Dose escalation (n = 44) was associated with an increase in skin reactions ≥ grade 2 compared with standard (n = 45) dosing (59% v 38%, respectively). Dose escalation, compared with standard dosing, showed some evidence for improved response rate (30% v 16%, respectively) and disease control rate (70% v 58%, respectively) but no indication of benefit in relation to overall survival. In an exploratory analysis, dose escalation seemed to increase response rate compared with standard dosing in patients with KRAS wild-type but not KRAS mutant tumors.
Conclusion: Cetuximab serum concentrations increased predictably with dose. Higher dose levels were well tolerated. The possible indication for improved efficacy in the dose-escalation group warrants further investigation.
Comment in
-
Maximum-tolerated dose, optimum biologic dose, or optimum clinical value: dosing determination of cancer therapies.J Clin Oncol. 2012 Aug 10;30(23):2815-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.43.4233. Epub 2012 Jul 2. J Clin Oncol. 2012. PMID: 22753919 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
A phase II study of high-dose cetuximab plus irinotecan in colorectal cancer patients with KRAS wild-type tumors who progressed after standard dose of cetuximab plus irinotecan.Oncology. 2013;84(4):210-3. doi: 10.1159/000346328. Epub 2013 Jan 17. Oncology. 2013. PMID: 23328486 Clinical Trial.
-
Cetuximab administered once every second week to patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a two-part pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic phase I dose-escalation study.Ann Oncol. 2010 Jul;21(7):1537-1545. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdp549. Epub 2009 Nov 25. Ann Oncol. 2010. PMID: 19940007 Clinical Trial.
-
Cetuximab plus capecitabine and irinotecan compared with cetuximab plus capecitabine and oxaliplatin as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: AIO KRK-0104--a randomized trial of the German AIO CRC study group.J Clin Oncol. 2011 Mar 10;29(8):1050-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.31.1936. Epub 2011 Feb 7. J Clin Oncol. 2011. PMID: 21300933 Clinical Trial.
-
[Cetuximab].Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2007 Aug;34(8):1192-5. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2007. PMID: 17687200 Review. Japanese.
-
Administration of cetuximab every 2 weeks in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: an effective, more convenient alternative to weekly administration?Oncologist. 2008 Feb;13(2):113-9. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2007-0201. Oncologist. 2008. PMID: 18305055 Review.
Cited by
-
Clinical and demographic characteristics associated with the receipt of chemotherapy treatment among 7951 elderly metastatic colon cancer patients.Cancer Med. 2013 Dec;2(6):907-15. doi: 10.1002/cam4.143. Epub 2013 Oct 10. Cancer Med. 2013. PMID: 24403264 Free PMC article.
-
Cost-effectiveness of second-line chemotherapy/biologics among elderly metastatic colon cancer patients.Adv Ther. 2014 Jul;31(7):724-34. doi: 10.1007/s12325-014-0134-8. Epub 2014 Jul 15. Adv Ther. 2014. PMID: 25022528 Free PMC article.
-
Targeted therapies: Cetuximab dosing by rash--is the scaling of EVEREST meaningful?Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2012 Oct;9(10):554-6. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2012.142. Epub 2012 Aug 14. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2012. PMID: 22889974 No abstract available.
-
Association between serum ligands and the skin toxicity of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibody in metastatic colorectal cancer.Cancer Sci. 2015 May;106(5):604-10. doi: 10.1111/cas.12642. Epub 2015 Apr 29. Cancer Sci. 2015. PMID: 25707609 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Mechanisms underlying skin disorders induced by EGFR inhibitors.Mol Cell Oncol. 2015 Jun 1;2(4):e1004969. doi: 10.1080/23723556.2015.1004969. eCollection 2015 Oct-Dec. Mol Cell Oncol. 2015. PMID: 27308503 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous