Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jul-Aug;127(4):383-90.
doi: 10.1177/003335491212700406.

State health department perceived utility of and satisfaction with ArboNET, the U.S. National Arboviral Surveillance System

Collaborators, Affiliations

State health department perceived utility of and satisfaction with ArboNET, the U.S. National Arboviral Surveillance System

Nicole P Lindsey et al. Public Health Rep. 2012 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

Objectives: We assessed the perceived utility of data collected through ArboNET, the national arboviral surveillance system, and evaluated state health department user satisfaction with system function.

Methods: We used an online assessment tool to collect information about types of arboviral surveillance conducted, user satisfaction with ArboNET's performance, and use of data collected by the system. Representatives of all 53 reporting jurisdictions were asked to complete the assessment during spring 2009.

Results: Representatives of 48 (91%) jurisdictions completed the assessment. Two-thirds of respondents were satisfied with ArboNET's overall performance. Most concerns were related to data transmission, particularly the lack of compatibility with the National Electronic Disease Surveillance System (NEDSS). Users found mosquito (85%), human disease (80%), viremic blood donor (79%), and veterinary disease (75%) surveillance data to be useful. While there was disagreement about the usefulness of avian mortality and sentinel animal surveillance, only 15% of users supported eliminating these categories. Respondents found weekly maps and tables posted on the U.S. Geological Survey (92%) and CDC (88%) websites to be the most useful reports generated from ArboNET data. Although many jurisdictions were willing to report additional clinical or laboratory data, time and resource constraints were considerations. Most respondents (71%) supported review and possible revision of the national case definition for human arboviral disease.

Conclusions: As a result of this assessment, CDC and partner organizations have made ArboNET NEDSS-compatible and revised national case definitions for arboviral disease. Alternative data-sharing and reporting options are also being considered. Continued evaluation of ArboNET will help ensure that it continues to be a useful tool for national arboviral disease surveillance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Percentage of U.S. state and territorial health departments satisfied with the performance of the ArboNETa surveillance system, as reported in a 2009 assessment (n=48)
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Arboviral disease surveillance activities performed by U.S. state and territorial health departments in 2008, as reported in a 2009 assessment (n=48)

References

    1. Nash D, Mostashari F, Fine A, Miller J, O'Leary D, Murray K, et al. The outbreak of West Nile virus infection in the New York City area in 1999. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:1807–14. - PubMed
    1. Reimann CA, Hayes EB, DiGuiseppi C, Hoffman R, Lehman JA, Lindsey NP, et al. Epidemiology of neuroinvasive arboviral disease in the United States, 1999–2007. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2008;79:974–9. - PubMed
    1. Lindsey NP, Staples JE, Lehman JA, Fischer M. Surveillance for human West Nile virus disease—United States, 1999–2008. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2010;59(2):1–17. - PubMed
    1. West Nile virus activity—United States, 2009. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2010;59(25):769–72. - PubMed
    1. Weaver SC, Reisen WK. Present and future arboviral threats. Antiviral Res. 2010;85:328–45. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types