Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Apr;6(2):155-60.
doi: 10.4103/1658-354X.97030.

Cooperation between research institutions and journals on research integrity cases: Guidance from the committee on publication ethics

Elizabeth Wager  1 , Sabine Kleinert
Affiliations

Cooperation between research institutions and journals on research integrity cases: Guidance from the committee on publication ethics

Elizabeth Wager et al. Saudi J Anaesth. 2012 Apr.

Abstract

Institutions and journals both have important duties relating to research and publication misconduct. Institutions are responsible for the conduct of their researchers and for encouraging a healthy research environment. Journals are responsible for the conduct of their editors, for safeguarding the research record, and for ensuring the reliability of everything they publish. It is, therefore, important for institutions and journals to communicate and collaborate effectively on cases relating to research integrity. To achieve this, we make the following recommendations.The institutions should:have a research integrity officer (or office) and publish their contact details prominentlyinform journals about cases of proven misconduct that affect the reliability or attribution of the research that they have publishedrespond to journals if they request information about issues, such as, disputed authorship, misleading reporting, competing interests, or other factors, including honest errors, that could affect the reliability of the published studyinitiate inquiries into allegations of research misconduct or unacceptable publication practice raised by journalshave policies supporting a responsible research conduct and systems in place for investigating suspected research misconduct.The journals should:publish the contact details of their editor-in-chief who should act as the point of contact for questions relating to research and publication integrityinform institutions if they suspect misconduct by their researchers, and provide evidence to support these concernscooperate with investigations and respond to institutions' questions about misconduct allegationsbe prepared to issue retractions or corrections (according to the COPE guidelines on retractions) when provided with findings of misconduct arising from investigationshave policies for responding to institutions and other organizations that investigate cases of research misconduct.

Keywords: Editors; ethics; publications.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None declared.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wager E. Coping with scientific misconduct. BMJ. 2011;343:d6586. - PubMed
    1. Wager E. What do journal editors do when they suspect research misconduct? Med Law. 2007;26:535–44. - PubMed
    1. Sox HC, Rennie D. Research misconduct, retraction, and cleansing the medical literature: Lessons from the Poehlman case. Ann Internal Med. 2006;144:609–13. - PubMed
    1. Wager E, Barbour V, Yentis S, Kleinert S. On behalf of COPE Council. Retractions: Guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) [Last accessed on 2012 Mar 20]. Available from: http://publicationethics.org/files/u661/Retractions_COPE_gline_final_3_S... .
    1. COPE code of conduct for journal editors. [Last accessed on 2012 Mar 20]. Available from: http://www.publicationethics.org/resources/code-conduct .