Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jun 27:6:185.
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00185. eCollection 2012.

Toward a neural basis of interactive alignment in conversation

Affiliations

Toward a neural basis of interactive alignment in conversation

Laura Menenti et al. Front Hum Neurosci. .

Abstract

The interactive-alignment account of dialogue proposes that interlocutors achieve conversational success by aligning their understanding of the situation under discussion. Such alignment occurs because they prime each other at different levels of representation (e.g., phonology, syntax, semantics), and this is possible because these representations are shared across production and comprehension. In this paper, we briefly review the behavioral evidence, and then consider how findings from cognitive neuroscience might lend support to this account, on the assumption that alignment of neural activity corresponds to alignment of mental states. We first review work supporting representational parity between production and comprehension, and suggest that neural activity associated with phonological, lexical, and syntactic aspects of production and comprehension are closely related. We next consider evidence for the neural bases of the activation and use of situation models during production and comprehension, and how these demonstrate the activation of non-linguistic conceptual representations associated with language use. We then review evidence for alignment of neural mechanisms that are specific to the act of communication. Finally, we suggest some avenues of further research that need to be explored to test crucial predictions of the interactive alignment account.

Keywords: dialogue; fMRI; language comprehension; language production; spoken communication.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The interactive-alignment model (based on Pickering and Garrod, 2004). Speakers A and B represent two interlocutors in a dialogue in this schematic representation of the stages of comprehension and production according to the model. The dashed lines represent alignment channels.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adank P., Hagoort P., Bekkering H. (2010). Imitation improves language comprehension. Psychol. Sci. 21, 1903–1909 10.1177/0956797610389192 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Amodio D. M., Frith C. D. (2006). Meeting of minds: the medial frontal cortex and social cognition. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 7, 268–277 10.1038/nrn1884 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Awad M., Warren J. E., Scott S. K., Turkheimer F. E., Wise R. J. S. (2007). A common system for the comprehension and production of narrative speech. J. Neurosci. 27, 11455–11464 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5257-06.2007 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baess P., Zhdanov A., Mandel A., Parkkonen L., Hirvenkari L., Mäkelä J. P., Jousmäki V., Hari R. (2012). MEG dual scanning: a procedure to study real-time auditory interaction between two persons. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 6:83 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00083 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bookheimer S. (2002). Functional MRI of language: new approaches to understanding the cortical organization of semantic processing. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 25, 151–188 10.1146/annurev.neuro.25.112701.142946 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources