Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jul;4(4):183-94.
doi: 10.1177/1758834012443725.

Novel agents in renal carcinoma: a reality check

Affiliations

Novel agents in renal carcinoma: a reality check

Yana G Najjar et al. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2012 Jul.

Abstract

The discovery of the molecular mechanisms underlying development of renal cell carcinoma have allowed for the development of novel targeted therapy for treatment of this disease. Recently, multiple agents have become approved by regulatory authorities for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma, including sunitinib, sorafenib, bevacizumab (with interferon alpha), pazopanib, temsirolimus and everolimus. While these therapies have generated excitement and have clearly altered the treatment paradigm, multiple limitations have been elucidated over time. These include but are not limited to the fact that treatment is not associated with complete responses, a significant number of patients are primarily refractory to treatment, and clinical trials mostly include clear cell histology. Furthermore, the role of these therapies in the treatment of brain metastases remains unclear and therapies can have considerable toxicities. RECIST criteria (Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors) can be inadequate for the assessment of these modalities' treatment efficacy, and biomarkers predictive of individual patient benefit have been elusive. This review summarizes the major clinical data and discusses these limitations.

Keywords: bevacizumab; everolimus; pazopanib; renal carcinoma; sorafenib; sunitinib; targeted therapy; temsirolimus.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest statement: BR declares search funding and consulting fees for Pfizer, GSK, Bayer/Onyx, AVEO, Roche.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bitoh S., Hasegawa H., Ohtsuki H., Obashi J., Fujiwara M., Sakurai M. (1984) Cerebral neoplasms initially presenting with massive intracerebral hemorrhage. Surg Neurol 22: 57–62 - PubMed
    1. Carden C.P., Larkin J.M., Rosenthal M.A. (2008) What is the risk of intracranial bleeding during anti-VEGF therapy? Neuro Oncol 10: 624–630 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chalian H., Tore H.G., Horowitz J.M., Salem R., Miller F.H., Yaghmai V. (2011) Radiologic assessment of response to therapy: comparison of RECIST versions 1.1 and 1.0. Radiographics 31: 2093–2105 - PubMed
    1. Choueiri T.K., Schutz F.A., Je Y., Rosenberg J.E., Bellmunt J. (2010) Risk of arterial thromboembolic events with sunitinib and sorafenib: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials. J Clin Oncol 28: 2280–2285 - PubMed
    1. Cohen H.T., McGovern F.J. (2005) Renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 353: 2477–2490 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources