Triple-negative breast cancer: are we making headway at least?
- PMID: 22754593
- PMCID: PMC3384094
- DOI: 10.1177/1758834012444711
Triple-negative breast cancer: are we making headway at least?
Abstract
The so-called triple-negative breast cancer, as defined by tumors that lack estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) overexpression, has generated growing interest in recent years despite representing less than 20% of all breast cancers. These tumors constitute an important clinical challenge, as they do not respond to endocrine treatment and other targeted therapies. As a group they harbor an aggressive clinical phenotype with early development of visceral metastases and a poor long-term prognosis. While chemotherapy remains effective in triple-negative disease, research continues to further identify potential new targets based on phenotypical and molecular characteristics of these tumors. In this respect, the presence of a higher expression of different biomarkers including epidermal growth factor receptor, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, fibroblast growth factor receptor and Akt activation has led to a proliferation of clinical trials assessing the role of inhibitors to these pathways in triple-negative tumors. Moreover, the described overlap between triple-negative and basal-like tumors, and the similarities with tumors arising in the BRCA1 mutation carriers has offered potential therapeutic avenues for patients with these cancers including poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors and a focus on a higher sensitivity to alkylating chemotherapy agents. Results from these trials have shown some benefit in small subgroups of patients, even in single-agent therapy, which reflects the heterogeneity of triple-negative breast cancer and highlights the need for a further subclassification of these types of tumors for better prognosis identification and treatment individualization.
Keywords: BRCA1; PARP; basal-like; breast cancer; poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors; triple negative.
Conflict of interest statement
References
-
- Adis R&D Profile (2006) Trabectedin: Ecteinascidin 743, Ecteinascidin-743, ET 743, ET-743, NSC 684766. Drugs R D 7: 317–328 - PubMed
-
- Andre F., Delaloge S., Soria J.C. (2011) Biology-driven phase II trials: what is the optimal model for molecular selection? J Clin Oncol 29: 1236–1238 - PubMed
-
- Andre F., Job B., Dessen P., Tordai A., Michiels S., Liedtke C., et al. (2009) Molecular characterization of breast cancer with high-resolution oligonucleotide comparative genomic hybridization array. Clin Cancer Res 15: 441–451 - PubMed
-
- Arnedos M., De La, Cruz J., Job B., Scott V., Dessen P., Gentien D., et al. (2011) High throughput molecular analyses to select patients for targeted agents. Eur J Cancer 47(Suppl. 1): S95
-
- Ashwell S., Janetka J.W., Zabludoff S. (2008) Keeping checkpoint kinases in line: new selective inhibitors in clinical trials. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 17: 1331–1340 - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials