Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012:2012:712435.
doi: 10.1155/2012/712435. Epub 2012 Jun 17.

Acute sedentary behaviour and markers of cardiometabolic risk: a systematic review of intervention studies

Affiliations

Acute sedentary behaviour and markers of cardiometabolic risk: a systematic review of intervention studies

Travis J Saunders et al. J Nutr Metab. 2012.

Abstract

North Americans spend half their waking hours engaging in sedentary behaviour. Although several recent interventions suggest that short bouts of uninterrupted sedentary behaviour may result in acute increases in cardiometabolic risk, this literature has not been reviewed systematically. This study performed a systematic review of the impact of uninterrupted sedentary behaviour lasting ≤7 days on markers of cardiometabolic risk (insulin sensitivity, glucose tolerance, and fasting insulin, glucose, and lipid levels) in humans. Interventions were identified through systematic searches of Medline and Embase and screened by 2 independent reviewers. A total of 25 interventions were identified that examined the impact of imposed sedentary behaviour on biomarkers of interest. The majority of these studies focused on healthy young men, with very little identified research on females or other age groups. We found consistent, moderate quality evidence that uninterrupted sedentary behaviour ≤7 days results in moderate and deleterious changes in insulin sensitivity, glucose tolerance, and plasma triglyceride levels. In contrast, there is inconsistent, very low-quality evidence linking uninterrupted sedentary behaviour with changes in insulin, glucose, and HDL- and LDL-cholesterol levels. These findings suggest that uninterrupted bouts of sedentary behaviour should be avoided in order to prevent or attenuate transient increases in metabolic risk.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow of articles through the search process.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Forest plot of mean differences of fasting glucose and insulin values between sedentary behaviour and control conditions (sedentary behaviour-control).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Forest plot of mean differences of fasting lipid levels between sedentary behaviour and control conditions (sedentary behaviour-control).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Forest plot of percent mean differences of insulin sensitivity and glucose tolerance between sedentary behaviour and control conditions (sedentary behaviour-control).
Algorithm 1
Algorithm 1
Medline search strategy.

References

    1. Hu FB, Li TY, Colditz GA, Willett WC, Manson JE. Television watching and other sedentary behaviors in relation to risk of obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus in women. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2003;289(14):1785–1791. - PubMed
    1. Rey-López JP, Vicente-Rodríguez G, Biosca M, Moreno LA. Sedentary behaviour and obesity development in children and adolescents. Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases. 2008;18(3):242–251. - PubMed
    1. Proper KI, Singh AS, Van Mechelen W, Chinapaw MJM. Sedentary behaviors and health outcomes among adults: a systematic review of prospective studies. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2011;40(2):174–182. - PubMed
    1. Katzmarzyk PT, Church TS, Craig CL, Bouchard C. Sitting time and mortality from all causes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 2009;41(5):998–1005. - PubMed
    1. Stamatakis E, Hamer M, Dunstan DW. Screen-based entertainment time, all-cause mortality, and cardiovascular events: population-based study with ongoing mortality and hospital events follow-up. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2011;57(3):292–299. - PubMed