Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jul 1;1(4):520-525.
doi: 10.4161/onci.19531.

A genetic inference on cancer immune responsiveness

Affiliations

A genetic inference on cancer immune responsiveness

Ena Wang et al. Oncoimmunology. .

Abstract

A cancer immune signature implicating good prognosis and responsiveness to immunotherapy was described that is observed also in other aspects of immune-mediated, tissue-specific destruction (TSD). Its determinism remains, however, elusive. Based on limited but unique clinical observations, we propose a multifactorial genetic model of human cancer immune responsiveness.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
Figure 1. Interplay among categorical modifiers of responsiveness. (A) Classical view of the relationship between host genetic background, tumor genetics and environmental factors. (B) A more likely scenario integrating the large overlap between the genetics of the host and the tumor and the over-reaching effect of environmental factors on both of them.
None
Figure 2. Check point regulating the winding road to cancer immune responsiveness. The host’s genetic may be the first limiting factor and a genetic predisposition to immune response may be necessary but not sufficient to allow cancer response to immunotherapy. Subsequently, genetic alteration of cancer cells may allow escape from immune recognition in spite of a favorable genetic background. Finally, quality and intensity of treatment and a myriad of hidden external factors may determine the final outcome.
None
Figure 3. A quantitative continuum determining the responsiveness of tumors according to genetic background of the host, genetics of cancer cells, effectiveness of treatment and other “hidden” external factors that may affect the final outcome.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Salk J. Immunological paradoxes: theoretical considerations in the rejection or retention of grafts, tumors, and normal tissue. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1969;164:365–80. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1969.tb14051.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wang E, Marincola FM. Bottom up: a modular view of immunology. Immunity. 2008;29:9–11. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2008.07.002. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hancock WW, Wang L, Ye Q, Han R, Lee I. Chemokines and their receptors as markers of allograft rejection and targets for immunosuppression. Curr Opin Immunol. 2003;15:479–86. doi: 10.1016/S0952-7915(03)00103-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wang E, Worschech A, Marincola FM. The immunologic constant of rejection. Trends Immunol. 2008;29:256–62. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2008.03.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Immunologic Signatures of Rejection. New York, NY: Springer, 2010.

LinkOut - more resources