Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Jul;63(3):208-13.
doi: 10.1007/s12070-011-0129-6. Epub 2011 Feb 23.

Evaluation of hearing loss in tympanic membrane perforation

Evaluation of hearing loss in tympanic membrane perforation

Kulwant Kaur Pannu et al. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011 Jul.

Abstract

To evaluate and analyse the hearing loss in tympanic membrane perforation based on size, site and duration of perforation. The material for this study was comprised of 100 patients of either sex and of age 15 years and above selected randomly. Size of tympanic membrane perforation was assessed under microscope using calibrated wire look. Patients were divided into three groups according to size; group I (0-9 mm(2)), Group II (9-30 mm(2)), Group III (≥ 30 mm(2)); according to site into anterior and posterior group; according to involvement of malleus into malleolar and non malleolar and according to duration into Group A (<1 year), Group B (1-5 years), Group C (≥ 5 years). Hearing loss was measured in each case with pure tone audiometry. Data was analysed statistically using paired t-test. Hearing loss increased as the perforation size increased [I vs. II (t - 4.23, p < 0.001), II vs. III (t - 8.19, p < 0.001), I vs. III (t - 11.68, p < 0.001)]. Hearing loss was more in posterior quadrant perforation than anterior quadrant perforation but difference was not significant statistically (t - 1.15, p > 0.05). Hearing loss was more in malleolar perforation (t - 5.74, p < 0.001). Hearing loss increased as the duration of disease increased [A vs. B (t - 2.01, p < 0.043), A vs. C (t - 5.49, p < 0.001), B vs. C (t - 4.14, p < 0.001)].

Keywords: Hearing loss; Perforation; Tympanic membrane.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Donaldson JA, Duckert LG. Anatomy of the ear. In: Paparella MM, Shumrick DA, editors. Otolaryngology. Basic sciences and related principles. 3. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company; 1991. p. 26.
    1. Wever EG, Lawrence M (1954) Physiological acoustics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ; Cited by Dahmann H (1991) Physiology of the middle ear and eustachian tube. In: Paparella MM, Shumrick DA (eds) Otolaryngology. Basic sciences and related principles, 3rd edn. W.B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia, pp 188–189
    1. Caye Thomasen P, Torfinnur RN, Mirko T (2007) Bilateral myringoplasty in chronic otitis media. Laryngoscope 117:903–906 - PubMed
    1. Kurian CA. Homologous dura for myringoplasty. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996;48(2):150–152.
    1. Ramanuj B, Anoop R. Hearing loss in rural population. The etiology. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998;50(2):147–154. doi: 10.1007/BF02991678. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources