Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2012 Summer;28(3):306-11.
doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2011.00402.x. Epub 2012 Jan 24.

FOBT completion in FQHCs: impact of physician recommendation, FOBT information, or receipt of the FOBT kit

Affiliations
Comparative Study

FOBT completion in FQHCs: impact of physician recommendation, FOBT information, or receipt of the FOBT kit

Terry C Davis et al. J Rural Health. 2012 Summer.

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the effect of common components of primary care-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening interventions on fecal occult blood test (FOBT) completion within rural and urban community clinics, including: (1) physician's spoken recommendation, (2) providing information or education about FOBTs, and (3) physician providing the FOBT kit; to determine the relative effect of these interventions; and to compare the effect of each intervention between rural and urban clinics.

Methods: We conducted structured interviews with patients aged 50 years and over receiving care at community clinics that were noncompliant with CRC screening. Self-report of ever receiving a physician's recommendation for screening, FOBT information or education, physician providing an FOBT kit, and FOBT completion were collected.

Findings: Participants included 849 screening-eligible adults; 77% were female and 68% were African American. The median age was 57; 33% lacked a high school diploma and 51% had low literacy. In multivariable analysis, all services were predictive of rural participants completing screening (physician recommendation: P = .002; FOBT education: P = .001; physician giving FOBT kit: P < .0001). In urban clinics, only physician giving the kit predicted FOBT completion (P < .0001). Compared to urban patients, rural patients showed a stronger relationship between FOBT completion and receiving a physician recommendation (risk ratio [RR]: 5.3 vs. 2.1; P = .0001), receiving information or education on FOBTs (RR: 3.8 vs 1.9; P = .0002), or receiving an FOBT kit from their physician (RR: 22.3 vs. 10.1; P = .035).

Conclusions: Participants who receive an FOBT kit from their physician are more likely to complete screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital signs: colorectal cancer screening, incidence, and mortality—United States, 2002–2010. MMWR. 2011;60(26):884–889. - PubMed
    1. Edwards B, Ward E, Kohler B, et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975–2006, featuring colorectal cancer trends and impact of interventions (risk factors, screening, and treatment) to reduce future rates. Cancer. 2010;116(3):544–573. - PMC - PubMed
    1. US Department of Health and Human Services. Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. . Healthy People 2020. Washington, DC: Author; 2010. [Accessed January 12, 2012.]. Available at www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topicsobjectives2020/objectiveslist.aspx?topi....
    1. Seeff L, Nadel M, Klabunde C, et al. Patterns and predictors of colorectal cancer test use in the adult US population. Cancer. 2004;100(10):2093–2103. - PubMed
    1. Cokkinides V, Chao A, Smith R, Vernon S, Thun M. Correlates of underutilization of colorectal cancer screening among US adults, age 50 years and older. Prev Med. 2003;36(1):85–91. - PubMed

Publication types