Reviewing social media use by clinicians
- PMID: 22759618
- PMCID: PMC3422846
- DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-000990
Reviewing social media use by clinicians
Abstract
Adoption studies of social media use by clinicians were systematically reviewed, up to July 26th, 2011, to determine the extent of adoption and highlight trends in institutional responses. This search led to 370 articles, of which 50 were selected for review, including 15 adoption surveys. The definition of social media is evolving rapidly; the authors define it broadly to include social networks and group-curated reference sites such as Wikipedia. Facebook accounts are very common among health science students (64-96%) and less so for professional clinicians (13-47%). Adoption rates have increased sharply in the past 4 years. Wikipedia is widely used as a reference tool. Attempts at incorporating social media into clinical training have met with mixed success. Posting of unprofessional content and breaches of patient confidentiality, especially by students, are not uncommon and have prompted calls for social media guidelines.
Conflict of interest statement
References
-
- Boyd D. Social Media is Here to Stay. Now What? Microsoft Research Tech Fest. Redmond, Washington, 2009. http://www.danah.org/papers/talks/MSRTechFest2009.html (accessed 22 Jun 2012).
-
- O'Reilly What is web 2.0? http://oreilly.com/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html (accessed 8 Aug 2011).
-
- Boyd D, Ellison NB. Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship. J Comput Mediat Commun 2008;13:210–30
-
- Hampton KN, Goulet LS, Rainie L, et al. Social Networking Sites and Our Lives. Pew Internet & American Life Project, 2011. http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2011/Technology-and-social-networks/S... (accessed 1 Sep 2011).
-
- Shirky C. The Political Power of Social Media. http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/67038/clay-shirky/the-political-p... (accessed 6 Sep 2011).
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
