Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2012 Aug;14(8):514-22.
doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2012.00489.x. Epub 2012 May 22.

Lymphovascular and perineural invasion as selection criteria for adjuvant therapy in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a multi-institution analysis

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Lymphovascular and perineural invasion as selection criteria for adjuvant therapy in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a multi-institution analysis

Sarah B Fisher et al. HPB (Oxford). 2012 Aug.

Abstract

Objectives: Criteria for the selection of patients for adjuvant chemotherapy in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCC) are lacking. Some authors advocate treating patients with lymph node (LN) involvement; however, nodal assessment is often inadequate or not performed. This study aimed to identify surrogate criteria based on characteristics of the primary tumour.

Methods: A total of 58 patients who underwent resection for IHCC between January 2000 and January 2010 at any of three institutions were identified. Primary outcome was overall survival (OS).

Results: Median OS was 23.0 months. Median tumour size was 6.5 cm and the median number of lesions was one. Overall, 16% of patients had positive margins, 38% had perineural invasion (PNI), 40% had lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and 22% had LN involvement. A median of two LNs were removed and a median of zero were positive. Lymph nodes were not sampled in 34% of patients. Lymphovascular and perineural invasion were associated with reduced OS [9.6 months vs. 32.7 months (P= 0.020) and 10.7 months vs. 32.7 months (P= 0.008), respectively]. Lymph node involvement indicated a trend towards reduced OS (10.7 months vs. 30.0 months; P= 0.063). The presence of either LVI or PNI in node-negative patients was associated with a reduction in OS similar to that in node-positive patients (12.1 months vs. 10.7 months; P= 0.541). After accounting for adverse tumour factors, only LVI and PNI remained associated with decreased OS on multivariate analysis (hazard ratio 4.07, 95% confidence interval 1.60-10.40; P= 0.003).

Conclusions: Lymphovascular and perineural invasion are separately associated with a reduction in OS similar to that in patients with LN-positive disease. As nodal dissection is often not performed and the number of nodes retrieved is frequently inadequate, these tumour-specific factors should be considered as criteria for selection for adjuvant chemotherapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Nodal status and overall survival in (a) node-negative (Nx + N0) vs. node-positive patients, and (b) clinically node-negative (Nx) vs. pathologically node-negative (N0) patients
Figure 2
Figure 2
Overall survival in patients with and without (a) lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and (b) perineural invasion (PNI)
Figure 3
Figure 3
Histopathology shows (a) lymphovascular invasion as demonstrated by tumour cells (black arrow) within a vascular channel and (b) perineural invasion with tumour cells (white arrow) within a neural bundle (*). (Haematoxylin and eosin stain; original magnification ×400)
Figure 4
Figure 4
Overall survival in patients with and without lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and perineural invasion (PNI) shows that the effects of LVI and PNI are not additive
Figure 5
Figure 5
Overall survival in patients without lymph node involvement (n= 45) with and without (a) lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and (b) perineural invasion (PNI)
Figure 6
Figure 6
Overall survival in patients with lymphovascular invasion or perineural invasion resembles that in patients with node-positive disease

References

    1. Shaib Y, El-Serag HB. The epidemiology of cholangiocarcinoma. Semin Liver Dis. 2004;24:115–125. - PubMed
    1. Khan SA, Toledano MB, Taylor-Robinson SD. Epidemiology, risk factors, and pathogenesis of cholangiocarcinoma. HPB. 2008;10:77–82. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Malhi H, Gores GJ. Cholangiocarcinoma: modern advances in understanding a deadly old disease. J Hepatol. 2006;45:856–867. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Endo I, House MG, Klimstra DS, Gönen M, D'Angelica M, Dematteo RP, et al. Clinical significance of intraoperative bile duct margin assessment for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:2104–2112. - PubMed
    1. McGlynn KA, Tarone RE, El-Serag HB. A comparison of trends in the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15:1198–1203. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms