Serum PBDEs in a North Carolina toddler cohort: associations with handwipes, house dust, and socioeconomic variables
- PMID: 22763040
- PMCID: PMC3404669
- DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1104802
Serum PBDEs in a North Carolina toddler cohort: associations with handwipes, house dust, and socioeconomic variables
Abstract
Background: Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) are persistent, bioaccumulative, and endocrine-disrupting chemicals.
Objectives: We used handwipes to estimate exposure to PBDEs in house dust among toddlers and examined sex, age, breast-feeding, race, and parents' education as predictors of serum PBDEs.
Methods: Eighty-three children from 12 to 36 months of age were enrolled in North Carolina between May 2009 and November 2010. Blood, handwipe, and house dust samples were collected and analyzed for PBDEs. A questionnaire was administered to collect demographic data.
Results: PBDEs were detected in all serum samples (geometric mean for ΣpentaBDE in serum was 43.3 ng/g lipid), 98% of the handwipe samples, and 100% of the dust samples. Serum ΣpentaBDEs were significantly correlated with both handwipe and house dust ΣpentaBDE levels, but were more strongly associated with handwipe levels (r = 0.57; p < 0.001 vs. r = 0.35; p < 0.01). Multivariate model estimates revealed that handwipe levels, child's sex, child's age, and father's education accounted for 39% of the variation in serum ΣBDE3 levels (sum of BDEs 47, 99, and 100). In contrast, age, handwipe levels, and breast-feeding duration explained 39% of the variation in serum BDE 153.
Conclusions: Our study suggests that hand-to-mouth activity may be a significant source of exposure to PBDEs. Furthermore, age, socioeconomic status, and breast-feeding were significant predictors of exposure, but associations varied by congener. Specifically, serum ΣBDE3 was inversely associated with socioeconomic status, whereas serum BDE-153 was positively associated with duration of breast-feeding and mother's education.
Conflict of interest statement
The findings and conclusions in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention or the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.
The authors declare they have no actual or potential competing financial interests.
Figures
Comment in
-
Human exposure assessment of indoor dust: importance of particle size and spatial position.Environ Health Perspect. 2013 Apr;121(4):A110. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1206470. Environ Health Perspect. 2013. PMID: 23548201 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Human exposure assessment of indoor dust: Webster and Stapleton respond.Environ Health Perspect. 2013 Apr;121(4):A110-1. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1206470R. Environ Health Perspect. 2013. PMID: 23548261 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Allen JG, McClean MD, Stapleton HM, Webster TF. Critical factors in assessing exposure to PBDEs via house dust. Environ Internat. 2008a;34(8):1085–1091. - PubMed
-
- Allen JG, McClean MD, Stapleton HM, Webstert TF. Linking PBDEs in house dust to consumer products using X-ray fluorescence. Environl Sci Technol. 2008b;42(11):4222–4228. - PubMed
-
- Black K, Shalat SL, Freeman NCG, Jimenez M, Donnelly KC, Calvin JA. Children’s mouthing and food-handling behavior in an agricultural community on the US/Mexico border. J Expo Anal Environ Epidem. 2005;15(3):244–251. - PubMed
-
- Butte W, Heinzow B. Pollutants in house dust as indicators of indoor contamination. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol. 2002;175:1–46. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources