[From medical complication to compensation for the prejudice]
- PMID: 22763310
- DOI: 10.1016/j.annfar.2012.04.006
[From medical complication to compensation for the prejudice]
Abstract
Claims in anesthesia and intensive care remains high, despite the reduction of morbidity and mortality associated with this activity. The absence of a national register makes it difficult to quantify. The Medical Committee of MACSF-Sou Medical Group, professional liability insurer of more than half of French physicians, provided us support. The amount of compensation paid is growing and the scope of compensated damage is expanded by the Dintilhac mission. The Act of March 4, 2002 has fully confirmed the principle of medical liability for misconduct. Generally, compensation for bodily injury is based on the demonstration of a causal link between a wrongful event and injury. The proof of fault lies with the applicant. Information accountable to patients and nosocomial infection are a particular setting. The Act of March 4, 2002 has also defined the concept of therapeutic risk. With the establishment of the Regional Commissions of Conciliation and Compensation (RCCI) and the National Office for Compensation of Medical Accident (Oniam), it is now possible for a patient to be compensated for an injury resulting from an accident Medical non-offending, while acknowledging the lack of accountability of the practitioner. The expertise conducted by an RCCI is adversarial. For the practitioner called to the cause, it is important to prepare for both substance and form, with the assistance of the medical board's insurance company.
Copyright © 2012 Société française d’anesthésie et de réanimation (Sfar). Published by Elsevier SAS. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
[Harmonisation of personal injury compensation in the European Union. Application to medical liability case law].Bull Acad Natl Med. 2006 Mar;190(3):725-41; discussion 741-6. Bull Acad Natl Med. 2006. PMID: 17140106 French.
-
Lessons learned from the "laboratories of democracy": a critique of federal medical liability reform.Cornell Law Rev. 2006 Jul;91(5):1159-202. Cornell Law Rev. 2006. PMID: 16827219 No abstract available.
-
Compensation for medical injury in New Zealand: does "'no-fault" increase the level of claims making and reduce social and clinical selectivity?J Health Polit Policy Law. 2002 Oct;27(5):833-54. doi: 10.1215/03616878-27-5-833. J Health Polit Policy Law. 2002. PMID: 12465781
-
[Regional conciliation and compensation commissions: how they work].Presse Med. 2006 Nov;35(11 Pt 2):1707-1715. doi: 10.1016/S0755-4982(06)74885-0. Presse Med. 2006. PMID: 17086130 Review. French.
-
[Medical accountability: current elements].Bull Acad Natl Med. 2014 Apr-May;198(4-5):689-700; discussion 700-1. Bull Acad Natl Med. 2014. PMID: 26753401 Review. French.
Cited by
-
[Legal redress in relation to physical injury due to post-traumatic anterior pituitary insufficiency].Pan Afr Med J. 2017 Nov 28;28:277. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2017.28.277.12635. eCollection 2017. Pan Afr Med J. 2017. PMID: 29942411 Free PMC article. French.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical