Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Dec 20;31(29):3805-20.
doi: 10.1002/sim.5453. Epub 2012 Jul 4.

Quantifying the impact of between-study heterogeneity in multivariate meta-analyses

Affiliations
Free PMC article

Quantifying the impact of between-study heterogeneity in multivariate meta-analyses

Dan Jackson et al. Stat Med. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

Measures that quantify the impact of heterogeneity in univariate meta-analysis, including the very popular I(2) statistic, are now well established. Multivariate meta-analysis, where studies provide multiple outcomes that are pooled in a single analysis, is also becoming more commonly used. The question of how to quantify heterogeneity in the multivariate setting is therefore raised. It is the univariate R(2) statistic, the ratio of the variance of the estimated treatment effect under the random and fixed effects models, that generalises most naturally, so this statistic provides our basis. This statistic is then used to derive a multivariate analogue of I(2), which we call I(R)(2). We also provide a multivariate H(2) statistic, the ratio of a generalisation of Cochran's heterogeneity statistic and its associated degrees of freedom, with an accompanying generalisation of the usual I(2) statistic, I(H)(2). Our proposed heterogeneity statistics can be used alongside all the usual estimates and inferential procedures used in multivariate meta-analysis. We apply our methods to some real datasets and show how our statistics are equally appropriate in the context of multivariate meta-regression, where study level covariate effects are included in the model. Our heterogeneity statistics may be used when applying any procedure for fitting the multivariate random effects model.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Dersimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trials. 1986;7:177–188. - PubMed
    1. Biggerstaff BJ, Tweedie RL. Incorporating variability in estimates of heterogeneity in the random-effect model in meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine. 1997;16:753–768. - PubMed
    1. Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Spiegelhalter DJ. A re-evaluation of random-effect meta-analysis. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A. 2009;172:137–159. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jackson D. The power of the standard test for the presence of heterogeneity in meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine. 2006;25:2688–2699. - PubMed
    1. Higgins JPT, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine. 2002;21:1539–1558. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources