Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2012 Jul;87(7):643-51.
doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2012.02.024.

Molecular techniques for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection: systematic review and meta-analysis

John C O'Horo  1 , Amy Jones, Matthew Sternke, Christopher Harper, Nasia Safdar
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Molecular techniques for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection: systematic review and meta-analysis

John C O'Horo et al. Mayo Clin Proc. 2012 Jul.

Abstract

Objective: To assess the usefulness of 2 rapid molecular diagnostic techniques, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP), in Clostridium difficile infection (CDI).

Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the accuracy of PCR and LAMP in diagnosis of CDI, including studies that used toxigenic culture or cytotoxicity assay as reference standard.

Results: A search of PubMed and CinAHL medical databases yielded 25 PCR studies, including 11,801 samples that met inclusion criteria and 6 heterogeneous studies that evaluated LAMP. With toxigenic culture as a standard, pooled sensitivity was 0.92 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.91-0.94); specificity, 0.94 (95% CI, 0.94-0.95); and diagnostic odds ratio, 378 (95% CI, 260-547). With cytotoxicity as a standard, pooled sensitivity was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.84-0.90); specificity, 0.97 (95% CI, 0.97-0.98); and diagnostic odds ratio, 370 (95% CI, 226-606).

Conclusion: Polymerase chain reaction is a highly accurate test for identifying CDI. Heterogeneity in LAMP studies did not allow meta-analysis; however, further research into this promising method is warranted.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Summary receiver operating curves (SROC) of studies using toxigenic culture (A) and cytotoxicity assay (B) as reference standard. With toxigenic culture reference standard, area under curve (AUC) is 0.99, with Q* of 0.95. With cytotoxicity assay reference standard, AUC is 0.99, with Q* 0.95. Individual studies and their relative weights are designated by the size of circles. Pooled results are represented by the diamond. Figure generated using Meta-DiSc software.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Estimated positive predictive value (PPV) (A) and negative predictive value (NPV) (B) of assays according to disease prevalence of stool tested. Median values for specificity and sensitivity were used to calculate these values. Reference standards are given in parentheses.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Diagnostic odds ratio (OR) of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests as compared with toxigenic culture (A) and cytotoxin assay (B). Studies that evaluated more than one PCR are noted in parentheses. BDGO = BD GeneOhm; CI = confidence interval; CX = Cepheid Xpert; LC = LightCycler; PG = Progastro.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Bartlett J.G. Antibiotic-associated diarrhea. Clin Infect Dis. 1992;15(4):573–581. - PubMed
    1. Warny M., Pepin J., Fang A. Toxin production by an emerging strain of Clostridium difficile associated with outbreaks of severe disease in North America and Europe. Lancet. 2005;366(9491):1079–1084. - PubMed
    1. Pépin J., Valiquette L., Alary M.E. Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea in a region of Quebec from 1991 to 2003: a changing pattern of disease severity. CMAJ. 2004;171(5):466–472. - PMC - PubMed
    1. McDonald L.C., Killgore G.E., Thompson A. An epidemic, toxin gene-variant strain of Clostridium difficile. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(23):2433–2441. - PubMed
    1. Bartlett J.G. Narrative review: the new epidemic of Clostridium difficile-associated enteric disease. Ann Intern Med. 2006;145(10):758–764. - PubMed

MeSH terms