Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012;7(6):e38224.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038224. Epub 2012 Jun 29.

Allele summation of diabetes risk genes predicts impaired glucose tolerance in female and obese individuals

Affiliations

Allele summation of diabetes risk genes predicts impaired glucose tolerance in female and obese individuals

Katarzyna Linder et al. PLoS One. 2012.

Abstract

Introduction: Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in approximately 40 genes have been associated with an increased risk for type 2 diabetes (T2D) in genome-wide association studies. It is not known whether a similar genetic impact on the risk of prediabetes (impaired glucose tolerance [IGT] or impaired fasting glycemia [IFG]) exists.

Methods: In our cohort of 1442 non-diabetic subjects of European origin (normal glucose tolerance [NGT] n = 1046, isolated IFG n = 142, isolated IGT n = 140, IFG+IGT n = 114), an impact on glucose homeostasis has been shown for 9 SNPs in previous studies in this specific cohort. We analyzed these SNPs (within or in the vicinity of the genes TCF7L2, KCNJ11, HHEX, SLC30A8, WFS1, KCNQ1, MTNR1B, FTO, PPARG) for association with prediabetes.

Results: The genetic risk load was significantly associated with the risk for IGT (p = 0.0006) in a model including gender, age, BMI and insulin sensitivity. To further evaluate potential confounding effects, we stratified the population on gender, BMI and insulin sensitivity. The association of the risk score with IGT was present in female participants (p = 0.008), but not in male participants. The risk score was significantly associated with IGT (p = 0.008) in subjects with a body mass index higher than 30 kg/m(2) but not in non-obese individuals. Furthermore, only in insulin resistant subjects a significant association between the genetic load and the risk for IGT (p = 0.01) was found.

Discussion: We found that T2D genetic risk alleles cause an increased risk for IGT. This effect was not present in male, lean and insulin sensitive subjects, suggesting a protective role of beneficial environmental factors on the genetic risk.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Odds ratios for IGT per risk allele in the whole cohort and in subgroups.
Boxes indicate odds ratio ± standard error; whiskers indicate 95% confidence interval. Overall indicates whole cohort. Lean indicates BMI <30 kg/m2. Obese indicates BMI > = 30 kg/m2. Sensitive indicates insulin sensitivity index > = 14.3. aadjusted for sex, age, BMI and insulin sensitivity; b adjusted for age, BMI and insulin sensitivity; c adjusted for sex, age and insulin sensitivity; d adjusted for sex, age and BMI.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ershow A. Environmental influences on development of type 2 diabetes and obesity: challenges in personalizing prevention and management. Journal of diabetes science and technology. 2009;3:727–734. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Staiger H, Machicao F, Fritsche A, Haring H-U. Pathomechanisms of Type 2 Diabetes Genes. Endocr Rev. 2009;30:557–585. - PubMed
    1. Doria A, Patti M-E, Kahn CR. The emerging genetic architecture of type 2 diabetes. Cell Metab. 2008;8:186–200. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2008.08.006. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. McCarthy MI. Genomics, Type 2 Diabetes, and Obesity. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:2339–2350. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0906948. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Billings L, Florez J. The genetics of type 2 diabetes: what have we learned from GWAS? Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2010;1212:59–77. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types