User characteristics and out-of-pocket expenditures for progestin-only versus combined oral contraceptives
- PMID: 22770791
- DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.05.018
User characteristics and out-of-pocket expenditures for progestin-only versus combined oral contraceptives
Abstract
Background: Little is known about the proportion of oral contraceptive pill (OCP) users that use progestin-only pills (POPs), factors associated with POP use, and whether out-of-pocket expenditures and dispensing patterns are similar to combined oral contraceptives (COCs).
Study design: Observational cohort using 1996-2008 Medical Expenditure Panel Surveys.
Results: Among all OCP users, 4% used POPs and changed little between 1996 and 2008. Women were more likely to use POPs if they received postpartum care (p<.001), had a diagnosis of hypertension (p<.001) or resided in the West (p<.01). POP users, compared to COC users, were more likely to pay $15 and more (p<.01) and less likely to obtain more than one pack per purchase (p<.001), controlling for age, race/ethnicity and insurance coverage.
Conclusion: POP use is very low in the United States. POP users obtained fewer packs per purchase compared with COC users, suggesting that POP may be used as transitional OCPs, particularly during the postpartum period.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Types of combined oral contraceptives used by US women.Contraception. 2012 Dec;86(6):659-65. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.05.017. Epub 2012 Jul 6. Contraception. 2012. PMID: 22770787 Free PMC article.
-
Out-of-pocket expenditures for oral contraceptives and number of packs per purchase.J Am Med Womens Assoc (1972). 2004 Winter;59(1):36-42. J Am Med Womens Assoc (1972). 2004. PMID: 14768985
-
Choosing the Right Oral Contraceptive Pill for Teens.Pediatr Clin North Am. 2017 Apr;64(2):343-358. doi: 10.1016/j.pcl.2016.11.005. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2017. PMID: 28292450 Review.
-
Potential public sector cost-savings from over-the-counter access to oral contraceptives.Contraception. 2015 May;91(5):373-9. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.01.010. Epub 2015 Feb 27. Contraception. 2015. PMID: 25732570
-
Multiphasic oral contraceptives. Efficacy and metabolic impact.J Reprod Med. 1987 Jan;32(1):28-36. J Reprod Med. 1987. PMID: 3550064 Review.
Cited by
-
Oral contraceptives and breast cancer risk overall and by molecular subtype among young women.Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014 May;23(5):755-64. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-0944. Epub 2014 Mar 14. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014. PMID: 24633144 Free PMC article.
-
Event-Related Potentials in Women on the Pill: Neural Correlates of Positive and Erotic Stimulus Processing in Oral Contraceptive Users.Front Neurosci. 2022 Jan 4;15:798823. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.798823. eCollection 2021. Front Neurosci. 2022. PMID: 35058744 Free PMC article.
-
The Association Between Estrogen-Containing Oral Contraceptive Pills and Hypothyroidism.Int J Endocrinol. 2025 Mar 18;2025:5978558. doi: 10.1155/ije/5978558. eCollection 2025. Int J Endocrinol. 2025. PMID: 40135042 Free PMC article.
-
Interest in over-the-counter access to oral contraceptives among women in the United States.Contraception. 2013 Oct;88(4):544-52. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2013.04.005. Epub 2013 Apr 23. Contraception. 2013. PMID: 23664627 Free PMC article.
-
Ten Years of Experience in Contraception Options for Teenagers in a Family Planning Center in Thrace and Review of the Literature.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Feb 15;15(2):348. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15020348. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018. PMID: 29462872 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources