Mapping microvasculature with acoustic angiography yields quantifiable differences between healthy and tumor-bearing tissue volumes in a rodent model
- PMID: 22771882
- PMCID: PMC3426858
- DOI: 10.1148/radiol.12112000
Mapping microvasculature with acoustic angiography yields quantifiable differences between healthy and tumor-bearing tissue volumes in a rodent model
Abstract
Purpose: To determine if the morphologies of microvessels could be extracted from contrast material-enhanced acoustic angiographic ultrasonographic (US) images and used as a quantitative basis for distinguishing healthy from diseased tissue.
Materials and methods: All studies were institutional animal care and use committee approved. Three-dimensional contrast-enhanced acoustic angiographic images were acquired in both healthy (n = 7) and tumor-bearing (n = 10) rats. High-spatial-resolution and high signal-to-noise acquisition was enabled by using a prototype dual-frequency US transducer (transmit at 4 MHz, receive at 30 MHz). A segmentation algorithm was utilized to extract microvessel structure from image data, and the distance metric (DM) and the sum of angles metric (SOAM), designed to distinguish different types of tortuosity, were applied to image data. The vessel populations extracted from tumor-bearing tissue volumes were compared against vessels extracted from tissue volumes in the same anatomic location within healthy control animals by using the two-sided Student t test.
Results: Metrics of microvascular tortuosity were significantly higher in the tumor population. The average DM of the tumor population (1.34 ± 0.40 [standard deviation]) was 23.76% higher than that of the control population (1.08 ± 0.08) (P < .0001), while the average SOAM (22.53 ± 7.82) was 50.73% higher than that of the control population (14.95 ± 4.83) (P < .0001). The DM and SOAM metrics for the control and tumor populations were significantly different when all vessels were pooled between the two animal populations. In addition, each animal in the tumor population had significantly different DM and SOAM metrics relative to the control population (P < .05 for all; P value ranges for DM, 3.89 × 10(-)(7) to 5.63 × 10(-)(3); and those for SOAM, 2.42 × 10(-)(12) to 1.57 × 10(-)(3)).
Conclusion: Vascular network quantification by using high-spatial-resolution acoustic angiographic images is feasible. Data suggest that the angiogenic processes associated with tumor development in the models studied result in higher instances of vessel tortuosity near the tumor site.
© RSNA, 2012
Figures



Similar articles
-
The implementation of acoustic angiography for microvascular and angiogenesis imaging.Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2014;2014:4283-5. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2014.6944571. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2014. PMID: 25570939
-
Assessment of Molecular Acoustic Angiography for Combined Microvascular and Molecular Imaging in Preclinical Tumor Models.Mol Imaging Biol. 2017 Apr;19(2):194-202. doi: 10.1007/s11307-016-0991-4. Mol Imaging Biol. 2017. PMID: 27519522 Free PMC article.
-
The "Fingerprint" of Cancer Extends Beyond Solid Tumor Boundaries: Assessment With a Novel Ultrasound Imaging Approach.IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2016 May;63(5):1082-6. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2015.2479590. Epub 2015 Sep 18. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2016. PMID: 26394410 Free PMC article.
-
Visualization of Microvascular Angiogenesis Using Dual-Frequency Contrast-Enhanced Acoustic Angiography: A Review.Ultrasound Med Biol. 2020 Oct;46(10):2625-2635. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2020.06.009. Epub 2020 Jul 20. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2020. PMID: 32703659 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Italian Society of Cardiovascular Echography (SIEC) Consensus Conference on the state of the art of contrast echocardiography.Ital Heart J. 2004 Apr;5(4):309-34. Ital Heart J. 2004. PMID: 15185894 Review.
Cited by
-
Current trends in the characterization and monitoring of vascular response to cancer therapy.Cancer Imaging. 2024 Oct 23;24(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s40644-024-00767-8. Cancer Imaging. 2024. PMID: 39438891 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Background Removal and Vessel Filtering of Noncontrast Ultrasound Images of Microvasculature.IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2019 Mar;66(3):831-842. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2018.2858205. Epub 2018 Jul 20. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2019. PMID: 30040621 Free PMC article.
-
Use of 3-D Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound to Evaluate Tumor Microvasculature After Nanoparticle-Mediated Modulation.Ultrasound Med Biol. 2020 Feb;46(2):369-376. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2019.09.019. Epub 2019 Nov 4. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2020. PMID: 31694771 Free PMC article.
-
Improved Sensitivity in Ultrasound Molecular Imaging With Coherence-Based Beamforming.IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2018 Jan;37(1):241-250. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2017.2774814. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2018. PMID: 29293430 Free PMC article.
-
Ultrasound multiple scattering with microbubbles can differentiate between tumor and healthy tissue in vivo.Phys Med Biol. 2019 May 31;64(11):115022. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab1a44. Phys Med Biol. 2019. PMID: 30995615 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Lindner JR. Microbubbles in medical imaging: current applications and future directions. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2004;3(6):527–532 - PubMed
-
- Wilson SR, Burns PN. Microbubble-enhanced US in body imaging: what role? Radiology 2010;257(1):24–39 - PubMed
-
- Carr CL, Lindner JR. Myocardial perfusion imaging with contrast echocardiography. Curr Cardiol Rep 2008;10(3):233–239 - PubMed
-
- Lindner JR. Molecular imaging of cardiovascular disease with contrast-enhanced ultrasonography. Nat Rev Cardiol 2009;6(7):475–481 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources