Friction force measurement during cochlear implant insertion: application to a force-controlled insertion tool design
- PMID: 22772019
- DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31825f24de
Friction force measurement during cochlear implant insertion: application to a force-controlled insertion tool design
Abstract
Hypothesis: The aim of the study was to evaluate force profiles during array insertion in human cochlea specimens and to evaluate a mechatronic inserter using a 1-axis force sensor.
Background: Today, the surgical challenge in cochlear implantation is the preservation of the anatomic structures and the residual hearing. In routine practice, the electrode array is inserted manually with a limited sensitive feedback.
Materials and methods: Hifocus 1J electrode arrays were studied. The bench test comprised a mechatronic inserter combined to a 1-axis force sensor between the inserter and the base of the array and a 6-axis force sensor beneath the cochlea model. Influence of insertion tube material, speed (0.15, 0.5, and 1.5 mm/s) and lubricant on frictions forces were studied (no-load). Different models were subsequently evaluated: epoxy scala tympani model and temporal bones.
Results: Frictions forces were lower in the plastic tube compared with those in the metal tube (0.09 ± 0.028 versus 0.14 ± 0.034 at 0.5 mm/s, p < 0.001) and with the use of hyaluronic acid gel. Speed did not influence frictions forces in our study. Insertion force profiles provided by the 1- and 6-axis force sensors were similar when friction forces inside the insertion tool (no-load measurements) were subtracted from the 1-axis sensor data in the epoxy and temporal bone models (mean error, 0.01 ± 0.001 N).
Conclusion: Using a sensor included in the inserter, we were able to measure array insertion forces. This tool can be potentially used to provide real-time information to the surgeon during the procedure.
Similar articles
-
Cochlear implant insertion forces in microdissected human cochlea to evaluate a prototype array.Audiol Neurootol. 2012;17(5):290-8. doi: 10.1159/000338406. Epub 2012 May 30. Audiol Neurootol. 2012. PMID: 22653365
-
Impact of the insertion speed of cochlear implant electrodes on the insertion forces.Otol Neurotol. 2011 Jun;32(4):565-70. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e318219f6ac. Otol Neurotol. 2011. PMID: 21478788
-
The effect of different lubricants on cochlear implant electrode insertion forces.Otol Neurotol. 2011 Sep;32(7):1050-6. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31821b3c88. Otol Neurotol. 2011. PMID: 21512420
-
The rational for a mid-scala electrode array.Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2016 Jun;133 Suppl 1:S61-2. doi: 10.1016/j.anorl.2016.05.002. Epub 2016 May 27. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2016. PMID: 27246747 Review.
-
Potential benefits from deeply inserted cochlear implant electrodes.Ear Hear. 2011 Jul-Aug;32(4):411-27. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3182064bda. Ear Hear. 2011. PMID: 21248642 Review.
Cited by
-
Advances in Evaluation of Electrode Insertion Trauma Induced Residual Hearing loss in Cochlear Implant Recipients and its significance- A Narrative Review.Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Oct;76(5):4949-4957. doi: 10.1007/s12070-024-04801-w. Epub 2024 Jun 17. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024. PMID: 39376296
-
Multi-axis robotic forceps with decoupled pneumatic actuation and force sensing for cochlear implantation.Nat Commun. 2025 Feb 14;16(1):1648. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-56958-9. Nat Commun. 2025. PMID: 39952944 Free PMC article.
-
Optical method to preserve residual hearing in patients receiving a cochlear implant.Front Audiol Otol. 2024;2:1376699. doi: 10.3389/fauot.2024.1376699. Epub 2024 Apr 15. Front Audiol Otol. 2024. PMID: 40791787 Free PMC article.
-
Uncoiling the Human Cochlea-Physical Scala Tympani Models to Study Pharmacokinetics Inside the Inner Ear.Life (Basel). 2021 Apr 21;11(5):373. doi: 10.3390/life11050373. Life (Basel). 2021. PMID: 33919445 Free PMC article.
-
Residual Hearing Preservation with the Evo® Cochlear Implant Electrode Array: Preliminary Results.Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Oct;20(4):353-358. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1572530. Epub 2016 Feb 16. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016. PMID: 27746839 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources