A comparison of a continuous noninvasive arterial pressure (CNAP™) monitor with an invasive arterial blood pressure monitor in the cardiac surgical ICU
- PMID: 22772511
- DOI: 10.4103/0971-9784.97973
A comparison of a continuous noninvasive arterial pressure (CNAP™) monitor with an invasive arterial blood pressure monitor in the cardiac surgical ICU
Abstract
Accurate measurement and display of arterial blood pressure is essential for rational management of adult cardiac surgical patients. Because of the lower risk of complications, noninvasive monitoring methods gain importance. A newly developed continuous noninvasive arterial blood pressure (CNAP™) monitor is available and has been validated perioperatively. In a prospective study we compared the CNAP™ monitoring device with invasive arterial blood pressure (IAP) measurement in 30 patients in a cardiac surgical Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Patients were either mechanically ventilated or spontaneously breathing, with or without inotropes. CNAP™ was applied on two fingers of the hand contralateral to the IAP monitoring catheter. Systolic, diastolic and mean pressure data were recorded every minute for 2 h simultaneously for both IAP and CNAP™. Statistical analysis included construction of mountain plot and Bland Altman plots for assessing limits of agreement and bias (accuracy) calculation. Three thousand and six hundred pairs of data were analyzed. The CNAP™ systolic arterial pressure bias was 10.415 mmHg and the CNAP™ diastolic arterial pressure bias was -5.3386 mmHg; the mean arterial pressure (MAP) of CNAP™ was close to the MAP of IAP, with a bias of 0.03944 mmHg. The Bland Altman plot showed a uniform distribution and a good agreement of all arterial blood pressure values between CNAP™ and IAP. Percentage within limits of agreement was 94.5%, 95.1% and 99.4% for systolic, diastolic and MAP. Calculated limits of agreement were -4.60 to 25.43, -13.38 to 2.70 and -5.95 to 6.03 mmHg for systolic, diastolic and mean BP, respectively. The mountain plot showed similar results as the Bland Altman plots. We conclude CNAP™ is a reliable, noninvasive, continuous blood pressure monitor that provides real-time estimates of arterial pressure comparable to those generated by an invasive arterial catheter system. CNAP™ can be used as an alternative to IAP.
Similar articles
-
Accuracy of the CNAP™ monitor, a noninvasive continuous blood pressure device, in providing beat-to-beat blood pressure readings in pediatric patients weighing 20-40 kilograms.Paediatr Anaesth. 2013 Nov;23(11):989-93. doi: 10.1111/pan.12173. Epub 2013 Apr 9. Paediatr Anaesth. 2013. PMID: 23565770 Clinical Trial.
-
Evaluation of continuous non-invasive arterial pressure monitoring during induction of general anaesthesia in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.Indian J Anaesth. 2015 Jan;59(1):21-5. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.149444. Indian J Anaesth. 2015. PMID: 25684809 Free PMC article.
-
Ability of non-invasive intermittent blood pressure monitoring and a continuous non-invasive arterial pressure monitor (CNAP™) to provide new readings in each 1-min interval during elective caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia.Anaesthesia. 2012 Mar;67(3):274-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06996.x. Anaesthesia. 2012. PMID: 22321084
-
Cardiac Output Monitoring: Validation Studies-how Results Should be Presented.Curr Anesthesiol Rep. 2017;7(4):410-415. doi: 10.1007/s40140-017-0239-0. Epub 2017 Oct 27. Curr Anesthesiol Rep. 2017. PMID: 29200975 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Understanding Bland Altman analysis.Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2015 Jun 5;25(2):141-51. doi: 10.11613/BM.2015.015. eCollection 2015. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2015. PMID: 26110027 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
A Review of Noninvasive Methodologies to Estimate the Blood Pressure Waveform.Sensors (Basel). 2022 May 23;22(10):3953. doi: 10.3390/s22103953. Sensors (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35632360 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Accuracy of non-invasive and minimally invasive hemodynamic monitoring: where do we stand?Ann Transl Med. 2019 Sep;7(17):421. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.07.06. Ann Transl Med. 2019. PMID: 31660320 Free PMC article. Review.
-
When should we adopt continuous noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring technologies into clinical routine?J Clin Monit Comput. 2015 Feb;29(1):1-3. doi: 10.1007/s10877-014-9619-x. J Clin Monit Comput. 2015. PMID: 25246243 No abstract available.
-
Continuous noninvasive arterial pressure measurement using the volume clamp method: an evaluation of the CNAP device in intensive care unit patients.J Clin Monit Comput. 2015 Dec;29(6):807-13. doi: 10.1007/s10877-015-9670-2. Epub 2015 Mar 1. J Clin Monit Comput. 2015. PMID: 25726179
-
Comparison between noninvasive measurement of central venous pressure using near infrared spectroscopy with an invasive central venous pressure monitoring in cardiac surgical Intensive Care Unit.Ann Card Anaesth. 2016 Jul-Sep;19(3):405-9. doi: 10.4103/0971-9784.185520. Ann Card Anaesth. 2016. PMID: 27397443 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials