Efficacy and safety of a nano-emulsion gel formulation of adapalene 0.1% and clindamycin 1% combination in acne vulgaris: a randomized, open label, active-controlled, multicentric, phase IV clinical trial
- PMID: 22772617
- DOI: 10.4103/0378-6323.98077
Efficacy and safety of a nano-emulsion gel formulation of adapalene 0.1% and clindamycin 1% combination in acne vulgaris: a randomized, open label, active-controlled, multicentric, phase IV clinical trial
Abstract
Background: Acne vulgaris is a very common skin disease with a significant detrimental effect on the quality of life of the patients.
Aims: To assess the comparative efficacy and safety of a nano-emulsion gel formulation of adapalene and clindamycin combination with its conventional formulation in the treatment of acne vulgaris of the face. It was a prospective, randomized, open label, active-controlled, multicentric, clinical trial.
Methods: Eligible patients suffering from acne vulgaris of the face were randomized to receive once-daily treatment with a nano-emulsion gel or conventional gel formulation of adapalene 0.1% and clindamycin (as phosphate) 1% combination for 12 weeks. Total, inflammatory and noninflammatory lesion counts, with grading of acne severity were carried out on a monthly basis. Safety assessments were done to determine the comparative local and systemic tolerability. Two-tailed significance testing was carried out with appropriate statistical tests, and P-values < 0.05 were considered as significant.
Results: 209/212 patients enrolled in the study were eligible for efficacy and safety assessments in both nano-emulsion gel (118/119 patients) and conventional gel (91/93 patients) groups. Significantly better reductions in total (79.7% vs. 62.7%), inflammatory (88.7% vs. 71.4%) and noninflammatory (74.9% vs. 58.4%) lesions were reported with the nano-emulsion gel as compared to the conventional gel (P < 0.001 for all). Mean acne severity score also reduced significantly more with the nano-emulsion formulation (1.9 ± 0.9 vs. 1.4 ± 1.0; P < 0.001) than the comparator. Significantly lower incidence and lesser intensity of adverse events like local irritation (4.2% vs. 19.8%; P < 0.05) and erythema (0.8% vs. 9.9%; P < 0.05) were recorded with the nano-emulsion gel.
Conclusions: The nano-emulsion gel formulation of adapalene and clindamycin combination appears to be more efficacious and better tolerated than the conventional formulation for the treatment of acne vulgaris in Indian patients. Further studies can elucidate the comparative treatment benefits of this nano-emulsion gel formulation.
Similar articles
-
The tolerability profile of clindamycin 1%/benzoyl peroxide 5% gel vs. adapalene 0.1%/benzoyl peroxide 2.5% gel for facial acne: results of a randomized, single-blind, split-face study.J Cosmet Dermatol. 2012 Dec;11(4):251-60. doi: 10.1111/jocd.12013. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2012. PMID: 23174047 Clinical Trial.
-
Safety and efficacy of clindamycin phosphate 1.2%-benzoyl peroxide 3% fixed-dose combination gel for the treatment of acne vulgaris: a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active- and vehicle-controlled study.J Drugs Dermatol. 2011 Dec;10(12):1382-96. J Drugs Dermatol. 2011. PMID: 22134562 Clinical Trial.
-
Study of the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of 2 fixed-dose combination gels in the management of acne vulgaris.Cutis. 2009 Oct;84(4):223-9. Cutis. 2009. PMID: 19911678 Clinical Trial.
-
Adapalene 0.1%/benzoyl peroxide 2.5% gel: a review of its use in the treatment of acne vulgaris in patients aged ≥ 12 years.Am J Clin Dermatol. 2011 Dec 1;12(6):407-20. doi: 10.2165/11208170-000000000-00000. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2011. PMID: 21967116 Review.
-
Adapalene 0.1% and benzoyl peroxide 2.5%: a novel combination for treatment of acne vulgaris.Skin Therapy Lett. 2009 Jul-Aug;14(6):4-5. Skin Therapy Lett. 2009. PMID: 19609474 Review.
Cited by
-
Synchronizing Pharmacotherapy in Acne with Review of Clinical Care.Indian J Dermatol. 2017 Jul-Aug;62(4):341-357. doi: 10.4103/ijd.IJD_41_17. Indian J Dermatol. 2017. PMID: 28794543 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A Comprehensive Review of the Strategies to Reduce Retinoid-Induced Skin Irritation in Topical Formulation.Dermatol Res Pract. 2024 Aug 17;2024:5551774. doi: 10.1155/2024/5551774. eCollection 2024. Dermatol Res Pract. 2024. PMID: 39184919 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Efficacy and Safety of a Fixed-Dose Combination Gel with Adapalene 0.1% and Clindamycin 1% for the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris (CACTUS): A Randomized, Controlled, Assessor-Blind, Phase III Clinical Trial.Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2024 Nov;14(11):3097-3112. doi: 10.1007/s13555-024-01286-x. Epub 2024 Nov 1. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2024. PMID: 39487326 Free PMC article.
-
Use of Retinoids in Topical Antiaging Treatments: A Focused Review of Clinical Evidence for Conventional and Nanoformulations.Adv Ther. 2022 Dec;39(12):5351-5375. doi: 10.1007/s12325-022-02319-7. Epub 2022 Oct 11. Adv Ther. 2022. PMID: 36220974 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Enhancing Topical Pharmacotherapy for Acne and Rosacea: Vehicle Choices and Outcomes.J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2022 May;15(5):36-40. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2022. PMID: 35642224 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical