Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2012 Jul;24(7):2710-7.
doi: 10.1105/tpc.112.100115. Epub 2012 Jul 5.

Reproductive isolation during domestication

Affiliations
Review

Reproductive isolation during domestication

Hannes Dempewolf et al. Plant Cell. 2012 Jul.

Abstract

It has been hypothesized that reproductive isolation should facilitate evolution under domestication. However, a systematic comparison of reproductive barrier strength between crops and their progenitors has not been conducted to test this hypothesis. Here, we present a systematic survey of reproductive barriers between 32 economically important crop species and their progenitors to better understand the role of reproductive isolation during the domestication process. We took a conservative approach, avoiding those types of reproductive isolation that are poorly known for these taxa (e.g., differences in flowering time). We show that the majority of crops surveyed are isolated from their progenitors by one or more reproductive barriers, despite the fact that the most important reproductive barrier in natural systems, geographical isolation, was absent, at least in the initial stages of domestication for most species. Thus, barriers to reproduction between crops and wild relatives are closely associated with domestication and may facilitate it, thereby raising the question whether reproductive isolation could be viewed as a long-overlooked "domestication trait." Some of the reproductive barriers observed (e.g., polyploidy and uniparental reproduction), however, may have been favored for reasons other than, or in addition to, their effects on gene flow.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Hybrid Fitness of Crop–Progenitor Crosses. The percentage of all cases considered is shown.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Transition in Mating System during Domestication. The percentage of all cases considered is shown.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Breakdown of Self-Incompatibility (SI) during Domestication. The percentage of all cases considered is shown.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Agrawal A.F. (2006). Evolution of sex: Why do organisms shuffle their genotypes? Curr. Biol. 16: R696–R704 - PubMed
    1. Allard R.W. (1999). History of plant population genetics. Annu. Rev. Genet. 33: 1–27 - PubMed
    1. Arias D.M., Rieseberg L.H. (1994). Gene flow between cultivated and wild sunflowers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 89: 655–660 - PubMed
    1. Armbruster P., Reed D.H. (2005). Inbreeding depression in benign and stressful environments. Heredity (Edinb) 95: 235–242 - PubMed
    1. Baker H. (1959). Reproductive methods as factors in speciation in flowering plants. In Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology. (Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press), p. 177. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources