Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2013 May;39(3):940-5.
doi: 10.1037/a0029199. Epub 2012 Jul 9.

Test-potentiated learning: distinguishing between direct and indirect effects of tests

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Test-potentiated learning: distinguishing between direct and indirect effects of tests

Kathleen M Arnold et al. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 May.

Abstract

The facilitative effect of retrieval practice, or testing, on the probability of later retrieval has been the focus of much recent empirical research. A lesser known benefit of retrieval practice is that it may also enhance the ability of a learner to benefit from a subsequent restudy opportunity. This facilitative effect of retrieval practice on subsequent encoding is known as test-potentiated learning. Thus far, however, the literature has not isolated the indirect effect of retrieval practice on subsequent memory (via enhancing the effectiveness of restudy) from the direct effects of retrieval on subsequent memory. The experiment presented here uses conditional probability to disentangle test-potentiated learning from the direct effects of retrieval practice. The results indicate that unsuccessful retrieval attempts enhance the effectiveness of subsequent restudy, demonstrating that tests do potentiate subsequent learning.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Experimental design. The top row represents the 1-Test condition, and the bottom row represents the 5-Test condition. After initial study, participants took 1 or 5 tests before restudying the word pairs. This test(s)-restudy cycle repeated nine (1-Test) or three (5-Test) times. All participants then took a final test.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Proportion of items recalled on each test in both conditions as a function of trial number. Arrows represent the change in performance from the pre- to the post-restudy test for the first three restudy trials.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Proportion of items recalled on the post-restudy tests after adjusting for recall on the pre-restudy tests for Restudies 1, 2, and 3. Means for each condition are displayed in their respective bars. Error bars represent standard errors of the mean.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Left panel: The proportion of items retrieved on the pre-restudy tests that were also retrieved on the post-restudy tests after Restudies 1, 2, and 3 as a function of test condition. Right panel: The proportion of items not retrieved on the pre-restudy tests that were retrieved on the post-restudy tests after Restudies 1, 2, and 3 as a function of test condition. Means for each condition are displayed in their respective bars. Error bars represent standard errors of the mean.

References

    1. Cepeda NJ, Pashler H, Vul E, Wixted JT, Rohrer D. Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. Psychological Bulletin 2006 - PubMed
    1. Ebbinghaus H. In: Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology. Ruger HA, Bussenius CE, translators. New York: Dover; 1964. (Original work published 1885)
    1. Grimaldi PJ, Karpicke JD. When and why do retrieval attempts enhance subsequent encoding? Memory & Cognition. 2012;40:505–513. - PubMed
    1. Hays MJ, Kornell N, Bjork RA. When and why a failed test potentiates the effectiveness of subsequent study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, Cognition (in press) - PubMed
    1. Huelser BJ, Metcalfe J. Making related errors facilitates learning, but learners do not know it. Memory & Cognition. 2012;40:514–527. - PubMed

Publication types