The implementation of unit-based perinatal mortality audit in perinatal cooperation units in the northern region of the Netherlands
- PMID: 22776712
- PMCID: PMC3506548
- DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-195
The implementation of unit-based perinatal mortality audit in perinatal cooperation units in the northern region of the Netherlands
Abstract
Background: Perinatal (mortality) audit can be considered to be a way to improve the careprocess for all pregnant women and their newborns by creating an opportunity to learn from unwanted events in the care process. In unit-based perinatal audit, the caregivers involved in cases that result in mortality are usually part of the audit group. This makes such an audit a delicate matter.
Methods: The purpose of this study was to implement unit-based perinatal mortality audit in all 15 perinatal cooperation units in the northern region of the Netherlands between September 2007 and March 2010. These units consist of hospital-based and independent community-based perinatal caregivers. The implementation strategy encompassed an information plan, an organization plan, and a training plan. The main outcomes are the number of participating perinatal cooperation units at the end of the project, the identified substandard factors (SSF), the actions to improve care, and the opinions of the participants.
Results: The perinatal mortality audit was implemented in all 15 perinatal cooperation units. 677 different caregivers analyzed 112 cases of perinatal mortality and identified 163 substandard factors. In 31% of cases the guidelines were not followed and in 23% care was not according to normal practice. In 28% of cases, the documentation was not in order, while in 13% of cases the communication between caregivers was insufficient. 442 actions to improve care were reported for 'external cooperation' (15%), 'internal cooperation' (17%), 'practice organization' (26%), 'training and education' (10%), and 'medical performance' (27%). Valued aspects of the audit meetings were: the multidisciplinary character (13%), the collective and non-judgmental search for substandard factors (21%), the perception of safety (13%), the motivation to reflect on one's own professional performance (5%), and the inherent postgraduate education (10%).
Conclusion: Following our implementation strategy, the perinatal mortality audit has been successfully implemented in all 15 perinatal cooperation units. An important feature was our emphasis on the delicate character of the caregivers evaluating the care they provided. However, the actual implementation of the proposed actions for improving care is still a point of concern.
Figures
Similar articles
-
[Perinatal audit in the North of the Netherlands: the first 2 years].Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2011;155(18):A2892. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2011. PMID: 21557826 Dutch.
-
[Perinatal mortality in The Netherlands: an audit is now more necessary than ever].Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2008 Mar 15;152(11):603-5. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2008. PMID: 18410019 Dutch.
-
[Perinatal audit: the most important legal aspects].Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2008 Dec 13;152(50):2741-4. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2008. PMID: 19192588 Dutch.
-
Using perinatal audit to promote change: a review.Health Policy Plan. 1997 Sep;12(3):183-92. doi: 10.1093/heapol/12.3.183. Health Policy Plan. 1997. PMID: 10173399 Review.
-
The experience of the implementation of perinatal audit in Moldova.BJOG. 2014 Sep;121 Suppl 4:167-71. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12996. BJOG. 2014. PMID: 25236652 Review.
Cited by
-
Term perinatal mortality audit in the Netherlands 2010-2012: a population-based cohort study.BMJ Open. 2014 Oct 14;4(10):e005652. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005652. BMJ Open. 2014. PMID: 25763794 Free PMC article.
-
Classification of substandard factors in perinatal care: development and multidisciplinary inter-rater agreement of the Groningen-system.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Sep 11;15:215. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0638-5. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015. PMID: 26361757 Free PMC article.
-
Facility-based stillbirth review processes used in different countries across the world: a systematic review.EClinicalMedicine. 2023 Apr 27;59:101976. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.101976. eCollection 2023 May. EClinicalMedicine. 2023. PMID: 37180470 Free PMC article.
-
Investigating the benefits and challenges of including bereaved women in research: a multifaceted perinatal audit in a socially disadvantaged French district.BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 23;10(9):e034715. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034715. BMJ Open. 2020. PMID: 32967867 Free PMC article.
-
Bridging Perspectives, Building Resilience: Safety-II Guided Reflexive Dialogues Between Care Professionals and Clients as Part of Developing Integrated Maternity Care.Int J Integr Care. 2024 Oct 22;24(4):4. doi: 10.5334/ijic.8588. eCollection 2024 Oct-Dec. Int J Integr Care. 2024. PMID: 39464382 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Dunn PM, MacIlwaine G. Perinatal Audit. A report produced for the European Association of Perinatal Medicine. 1996. pp. 5–43.
-
- Jamtvedt G, Young JM, Kristoffersen DT, OBrien MA, Oxman AD. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;2:CD000259. - PubMed
-
- Bergsjo P, Bakketeig LS, Langhoff-Roos J. The development of perinatal audit: 20 years' experience. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2003;82:780–788. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources