Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2012 Jul-Aug;18(4):198-204.
doi: 10.1097/SPV.0b013e31825d65aa.

Validation of the surgical pain scales in women undergoing pelvic reconstructive surgery

Matthew D Barber  1 , Nancy Janz, Kim Kenton, Yvonne Hsu, W Jerod Greer, Keisha Dyer, Amanda White, Susan Meikle, Wen Ye
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Validation of the surgical pain scales in women undergoing pelvic reconstructive surgery

Matthew D Barber et al. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2012 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

Objective: Surgical pain scales (SPS) consist of 4 items that measure pain at rest, during normal activities, and during work/exercise and quantify unpleasantness of worst pain, which are valid and responsive in men undergoing hernia repair. Our objective was to evaluate the psychometric properties of SPS in women undergoing vaginal surgery for pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence.

Methods: We modified SPS by converting original response scales from a visual analog scale to numerical rating scales. Numerical rating scales have lower error rates and higher validity than visual analog scale. The sample included 169 women with stage II to IV pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence in a randomized trial comparing sacrospinous ligament fixation to uterosacral vault suspension with and without pelvic floor muscle training. Participants completed SPS and SF-36 at baseline, and 2 weeks and 6 months after surgery. Construct validity and responsiveness were examined in cross-sectional and longitudinal data using Pearson correlation and analysis of variance.

Results: Pain at rest, during normal activities, and during work/exercise worsened at 2 weeks (P<0.05); and all measures of pain improved from baseline to 6 months (P<0.0001). Construct validity was demonstrated by correlations of 0.51 to 0.74 between SPS and the SF-36 Bodily Pain Scale (P<0.0001). Pain worsened on SF-36 between baseline and 2 weeks in 63% of the participants, and this group demonstrated a mean (SD) increase in pain of 1.9 (2.8) on the SPS (effect size, 0.99), confirming responsiveness of the scale.

Conclusions: The modified SPS are valid and responsive in women after pelvic reconstructive surgery.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00597935.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Figure Modified Surgical Pain Scales
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Jamison RN, Ross MJ, Hoopman P, et al. Assessment of postoperative pain management: patient satisfaction and perceived helpfulness. Clin J Pain. 1997;13(3):229–36. - PubMed
    1. McCarthy M, Jr, Chang CH, Pickard AS, Giobbie-Hurder A, et al. Visual analog scales for assessing surgical pain. J Am Coll Surg. 2005;201(2):245–52. - PubMed
    1. Ware JE., Jr . Manual and Interpretation Guide. Boston: Heath Institute, New England Medical Center; 1993. SF-36 Health Survery.
    1. Eckardt AJ, Swales C, Bhattacharya K, et al. Open access colonoscopy in the training setting: which factors affect patient satisfaction and pain? Endoscopy. 2008;40(2):98–105. - PubMed
    1. Hogg-Johnson S, van der Velde G, Carroll LJ, et al. The burden and determinants of neck pain in the general population: results of the Bone and Joint Decade 2000–2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders. Spine. 2008;33(4 Suppl):S39–51. - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data