Comparative effectiveness and safety of methods of insulin delivery and glucose monitoring for diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 22777524
- DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-5-201209040-00508
Comparative effectiveness and safety of methods of insulin delivery and glucose monitoring for diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Background: Patients with diabetes mellitus need information about the effectiveness of innovations in insulin delivery and glucose monitoring.
Purpose: To review how intensive insulin therapy (multiple daily injections [MDI] vs. rapid-acting analogue-based continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion [CSII]) or method of monitoring (self-monitoring of blood glucose [SMBG] vs. real-time continuous glucose monitoring [rt-CGM]) affects outcomes in types 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus.
Data sources: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials through February 2012 without language restrictions.
Study selection: 33 randomized, controlled trials in children or adults that compared CSII with MDI (n=19), rt-CGM with SMBG (n=10), or sensor-augmented insulin pump use with MDI and SMBG (n=4).
Data extraction: 2 reviewers independently evaluated studies for eligibility and quality and serially abstracted data.
Data synthesis: In randomized, controlled trials, MDI and CSII showed similar effects on hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels and severe hypoglycemia in children or adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus and adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. In adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus, HbA1c levels decreased more with CSII than with MDI, but 1 study heavily influenced these results. Compared with SMBG, rt-CGM achieved a lower HbA1c level (between-group difference of change, 0.26% [95% CI, 0.33% to 0.19%]) without any difference in severe hypoglycemia. Sensor-augmented insulin pump use decreased HbA1c levels more than MDI and SMBG did in persons with type 1 diabetes mellitus (between-group difference of change, 0.68% [CI, 0.81% to 0.54%]). Little evidence was available on other outcomes.
Limitation: Many studies were small, of short duration, and limited to white persons with type 1 diabetes mellitus.
Conclusion: Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion and MDI have similar effects on glycemic control and hypoglycemia, except CSII has a favorable effect on glycemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus. For glycemic control, rt-CGM is superior to SMBG and sensor-augmented insulin pumps are superior to MDI and SMBG without increasing the risk for hypoglycemia.
Primary funding source: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.
Comment in
-
ACP Journal Club. Review: continuous glucose monitoring reduces HbA1c more than self-monitoring in type 1 diabetes.Ann Intern Med. 2013 Mar 19;158(6):JC9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-6-201303190-02009. Ann Intern Med. 2013. PMID: 23552900 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Methods for insulin delivery and glucose monitoring in diabetes: summary of a comparative effectiveness review.J Manag Care Pharm. 2012 Aug;18(6 Suppl):S1-17. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2012.18.s6-a.1. J Manag Care Pharm. 2012. PMID: 22984955 Free PMC article.
-
Continuous glucose monitoring systems for type 1 diabetes mellitus.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jan 18;1(1):CD008101. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008101.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012. PMID: 22258980 Free PMC article.
-
Integrated sensor-augmented pump therapy systems [the MiniMed® Paradigm™ Veo system and the Vibe™ and G4® PLATINUM CGM (continuous glucose monitoring) system] for managing blood glucose levels in type 1 diabetes: a systematic review and economic evaluation.Health Technol Assess. 2016 Feb;20(17):v-xxxi, 1-251. doi: 10.3310/hta20170. Health Technol Assess. 2016. PMID: 26933827 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical and cost-effectiveness of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion for diabetes.Health Technol Assess. 2004 Oct;8(43):iii, 1-171. doi: 10.3310/hta8430. Health Technol Assess. 2004. PMID: 15488165
-
Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion versus multiple daily injections of insulin for pregnant women with diabetes.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jun 7;2016(6):CD005542. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005542.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. PMID: 27272351 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Who Will Be Responsible for the Dialysis Bill? A Case Report and Narrative Review of Insulin Affordability 100 Years After the Discovery of Insulin.J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Jun 2. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06886-3. Online ahead of print. J Gen Intern Med. 2021. PMID: 34080108 Review.
-
Disordered eating behaviors in youth with type 1 diabetes: prospective pilot assessment following initiation of insulin pump therapy.Diabetes Technol Ther. 2013 May;15(5):428-33. doi: 10.1089/dia.2013.0008. Epub 2013 Apr 3. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2013. PMID: 23550556 Free PMC article.
-
The Efficacy and Frequency of Self-monitoring of Blood Glucose in Non-insulin-Treated T2D Patients: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Feb;38(3):755-764. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07864-z. Epub 2022 Nov 20. J Gen Intern Med. 2023. PMID: 36403159 Free PMC article.
-
Current treatment options and challenges in patients with Type 1 diabetes: Pharmacological, technical advances and future perspectives.Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2021 Jun;22(2):217-240. doi: 10.1007/s11154-021-09635-3. Epub 2021 Mar 23. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2021. PMID: 33755854 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Overcoming Barriers to Diabetes Technology in Youth with Type 1 Diabetes and Public Insurance: Cases and Call to Action.Case Rep Endocrinol. 2022 Mar 1;2022:9911736. doi: 10.1155/2022/9911736. eCollection 2022. Case Rep Endocrinol. 2022. PMID: 35273814 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical