Frequency of the first feature in action sequences influences feature binding
- PMID: 22777733
- DOI: 10.3758/s13414-012-0335-7
Frequency of the first feature in action sequences influences feature binding
Abstract
We investigated whether binding among perception and action feature codes is a preliminary step toward creating a more durable memory trace of an action event. If so, increasing the frequency of a particular event (e.g., a stimulus requiring a movement with the left or right hand in an up or down direction) should increase the strength and speed of feature binding for this event. The results from two experiments, using a partial-repetition paradigm, confirmed that feature binding increased in strength and/or occurred earlier for a high-frequency (e.g., left hand moving up) than for a low-frequency (e.g., right hand moving down) event. Moreover, increasing the frequency of the first-specified feature in the action sequence alone (e.g., "left" hand) increased the strength and/or speed of action feature binding (e.g., between the "left" hand and movement in an "up" or "down" direction). The latter finding suggests an update to the theory of event coding, as not all features in the action sequence equally determine binding strength. We conclude that action planning involves serial binding of features in the order of action feature execution (i.e., associations among features are not bidirectional but are directional), which can lead to a more durable memory trace. This is consistent with physiological evidence suggesting that serial order is preserved in an action plan executed from memory and that the first feature in the action sequence may be critical in preserving this serial order.
Similar articles
-
Effects of stimulus features and instruction on response coding, selection, and inhibition: evidence from repetition effects under task switching.Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2008 Oct;61(10):1573-600. doi: 10.1080/17470210701643397. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2008. PMID: 18777444
-
How object-specific are object files? Evidence for integration by location.J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Oct;36(5):1184-92. doi: 10.1037/a0019955. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010. PMID: 20718565
-
Auditory event files: integrating auditory perception and action planning.Atten Percept Psychophys. 2009 Feb;71(2):352-62. doi: 10.3758/APP.71.2.352. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2009. PMID: 19304624
-
Simple reaction time and perception of temporal order: dissociations and hypotheses.Percept Mot Skills. 1996 Jun;82(3 Pt 1):707-30. doi: 10.2466/pms.1996.82.3.707. Percept Mot Skills. 1996. PMID: 8774006 Review.
-
Binding and Retrieval in Action Control (BRAC).Trends Cogn Sci. 2020 May;24(5):375-387. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2020.02.004. Epub 2020 Mar 18. Trends Cogn Sci. 2020. PMID: 32298623 Review.
Cited by
-
On the importance of being first: serial order effects in the interaction between action plans and ongoing actions.Psychon Bull Rev. 2014 Feb;21(1):163-9. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0486-0. Psychon Bull Rev. 2014. PMID: 23896745
-
Partial Repetition Costs are Reduced but not Eliminated with Practice.J Cogn. 2022 Jun 23;5(1):37. doi: 10.5334/joc.230. eCollection 2022. J Cogn. 2022. PMID: 36072096 Free PMC article.
-
What Belongs Together Retrieves Together - The Role of Perceptual Grouping in Stimulus-Response Binding and Retrieval.J Cogn. 2022 Apr 12;5(1):28. doi: 10.5334/joc.217. eCollection 2022. J Cogn. 2022. PMID: 36072092 Free PMC article.
-
Action plan interrupted: resolution of proactive interference while coordinating execution of multiple action plans during sleep deprivation.Psychol Res. 2020 Mar;84(2):454-467. doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-1054-z. Epub 2018 Jul 13. Psychol Res. 2020. PMID: 30006887 Free PMC article.
-
Interference due to shared features between action plans is influenced by working memory span.Psychon Bull Rev. 2014 Dec;21(6):1524-9. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0627-0. Psychon Bull Rev. 2014. PMID: 24715506
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources